What are some important qualities of a good supervisor (boss)? Use specific details and examples to explain why these qualities are important.
Every person who works for a company expects to have a good (if not excellent) boss. And some qualities are unanimous in the subject what being a good supervisor means. Actually, a good boss is a leader that holds qualities. And these qualities I’m going to describe in the follow essay.
First at all, a good quality is charismatic. Every employee would like to have a leader that they can get along with. In my first internship I had a boss who didn`t like to be friendly with the employees. In front of the customers he was a great man, but inside the office he was bossy and grump. I don’t mean he needs to be our best friend and go out for drinks, but working in a better environment make the employees have a better production and enjoy the work.
Secondly, a good leader is someone we trust and respect. These qualities are very important because we offer dedication for the one we believe. In this case, if I trust in my manager, I will look forward to do a good job and make us to succed. I had a job once that we need to carry some secret information’s. In some cases I was the first one to hear the top secret and pass after to my supervisor. The fact I trust on her, made easy my job because I knew she was going to do her best to keep the secret until the time to be released. And every time we did a good job, she was gaining more respect from me. And this made me considered her an example of leadership.
In conclusion, some people are born to be bosses and other one to be a leaders. And the qualities they have will decide where they will be insert on. Good leader has qualities that make you respect them. Otherwise, they are just bosses demanding around.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 274, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...qualities I'm going to describe in the follow essay. First at all, a good quality ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 205, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[7]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'to doing'.
Suggestion: to doing
...rust in my manager, I will look forward to do a good job and make us to succed. I had...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 70, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a leader' or simply 'leaders'?
Suggestion: a leader; leaders
...e born to be bosses and other one to be a leaders. And the qualities they have will decid...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, if, look, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1384.0 1977.66487455 70% => OK
No of words: 320.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.325 4.8611393121 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55360498854 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 212.727598566 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515625 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 618.680645161 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.6898340177 48.9658058833 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 65.9047619048 100.406767564 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2380952381 20.6045352989 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.90476190476 5.45110844103 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22528944885 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0779262419911 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0752928033588 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16090127065 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0978877652617 0.0645574589148 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.6 11.7677419355 56% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 58.1214874552 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.1575268817 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.24 10.9000537634 66% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.55 8.01818996416 82% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 86.8835125448 51% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.