High school teachers (teachers of students ages 14-18) spend most of class time lecturing (speaking) while the students listen and take notes. Other high school teachers spend most of class time on discussion and projects that students are highly involved

Essay topics:

High school teachers (teachers of students ages 14-18) spend most of class time lecturing (speaking) while the students listen and take notes. Other high school teachers spend most of class time on discussion and projects that students are highly involved in and exchange their ideas. Which of these two approaches do you think is more effective for student learning and why?

In the fast-paced and technology-oriented world, teacher plays a vital role to learn student how to cope with problem and orienting their thoughts as well as aims. Throughout the history, teacher helps people triumph over obstacles and achieves success. Some propel believe that spending more time on discussion in a class has substantial beneficial for student toward future of their study and lives, whereas others have varied point of views. I am of the opinion that; the most time of a class spend on discussion with student and exchange ideas, the most would be nice for student to become prosperous in a given field for some reasons. In ensuing lines, I will address the most discernible grounds.

The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that spending time in class on discussion give student a chance to participate in the conversation. In essence, participation in class not only can give student remarkable confidence to bring up their idea, but also can induce them to more study in order to be part of class in every discussion. As a case in point, there is a body of psychological research that I read recently. The researchers conducted an interview with many volunteer students in order to find impact of discussion in a class, the data denoted that the host of them had a positive standpoint and experience in their such classes. On balance, this finding can at least partly explain why this positive point of views is intrinsic for flourishing in their class and future study.

Another noteworthy aspect that should be reflected in this explanation is that the teacher can introduce extra source and have time to transfer extra information to student. Needless to say that, in such classes teacher have time to transfer more information about a specific study instead of repeating the information in the books related to class. In other words, student who has intrigue in class can use such sources and extra information to thrive. Take a personal experience as an example, back to first year of university, I had a Quantum course; the professor of this course just discussed in class rather than bring information in book, thus we could learn many things about Quantum and for example, how to develop and history of it, that was very useful for me for making progress.

In light of these crucial reasons, I have strictly come to believe that spending time in class in very momentous for student who wants to prosper. For sake of brevity, a couple of points are worth to reiterating: firstly, they can have a chance to participate in class and also enhance their confidence to bring their idea; secondly, the teacher in this such classes can transfer extra and more information as well as introduce many sources to study. Albeit, it was a story in as nutshell; as a matter of fact, there are more reasonable grounds that can lend weight to my point of view.

Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:


Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, whereas, at least, for example, as a matter of fact, as well as, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 84.0 52.1666666667 161% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2397.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 493.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86206896552 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71206996034 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7455887743 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478701825558 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 738.0 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.8715083683 48.9658058833 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.0 100.406767564 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 20.6045352989 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.47058823529 5.45110844103 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273557705886 0.236089414692 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101751463994 0.076458572812 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069196330649 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186587526431 0.150856017488 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651227189546 0.0645574589148 101% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 11.7677419355 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 58.1214874552 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.5 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?

Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.