If you could invent something new, what product would you develop? Use specific details to explain why this invention is needed.
Inventing something new is a dream of each child, and I can remember how much I liked to invent something new when I was a child. Some people say nowadays invention is really hard, because we do not have anything special left to invent. But, in my view, we still have so many chances to invent new things and if I could invent something new, I would like to invent a flying car. I elaborate on my opinion with following reasons.
First and foremost, our streets and highways do not have any space for more cars. Traffic is one of the most important problems in almost all countries, and each day we waste so much of our precious time in traffics, but if we could have access to flying cars, we could overcome this problem. However there are some companies working on producing flying cars, but none of them has done it in real, and I really like to be the one who make this invention practical. My own life experience is a reason why I like to invent flying cars. I am living in Qazvin, a city in Iran, but my university is in Tehran, the capital of Iran, and each single day, I have to drive 350 Km to my University and stuck in traffic for almost 1hour. Every time I find myself in traffic, I look at the sky, and wish I could have a flying car. I believe this is the dream of all people in big cities, and I am sure if I invent this car, most of the people would like it.
Second, flying cars are more interesting. Most of the people like traveling by airplanes, because they can enjoy being beyond everything on the earth, and by using flying cars we can experience the same feeling. When we use flying cars, we can have all the earth beneath our foot, and being in this situation would highly decrease bad feelings we may have by driving in crowded streets. In my view, when we aim to invent something new, we must pay attention to the feeling we get from, as much as we pay attention to economic aspect of it. These days, people are too angry, and if we ask them what makes them really angry, they will count driving as one of the main reasons. By using flying cars we can experience more enjoyable transportation, and help people to feel better.
To sum up, I would like to mention that having a new invention in the transportation field is somehow risky and it must be highly analyzed. Any new invention in this field can change the life of millions of people and even a small mistake may kill so many people. But, if we put enough investment and energy on the invention of flying cars, they may even replace common cars we are using currently, and based on presented justifications I believe this invention would be favorable for most of the people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 293, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...g cars, we could overcome this problem. However there are some companies working on pro...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 50, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
..., I would like to mention that having a new invention in the transportation field is somehow ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 144, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
...sky and it must be highly analyzed. Any new invention in this field can change the life of mi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, may, really, second, so, still, in my view, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 9.8082437276 214% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 64.0 43.0788530466 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2169.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 499.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.34669338677 4.8611393121 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72634191566 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41863759834 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.440881763527 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 676.8 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 14.0 1.86738351254 750% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8562680503 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.45 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.95 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215982411344 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0812573710224 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745740829156 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170538647653 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0805702971702 0.0645574589148 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.25 10.9000537634 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.07 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.