It is better to have a broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.
The world recently needs those people who they are professional in an individual-specific field. If people rely on one special subject, their chance of having more benefits in their life will be increased. In this regard, there is a long-standing discussion among the experts about whether it is better people have the broad knowledge of many academic fields or they focus on one specific subject. However most of us aware about that anyone who is expert in his career he would be used in various opportunities and also it is very beneficial for himself too. Accordingly, I strongly disagree with the statement and in the following paragraphs, I will elaborate on my viewpoint for two notable reasons.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that those people who are skilled in on the special subject and also they just worked on one subject have more chances to absorb by job opportunities. In clear language, not only they will be determined as expert human forces to working in the variety of positions but also they will be essential for teaching young people. For example, a graphic designer who is professional in advertising management and additionally he worked only in advertising field is very crucial for advertising studios than the other graphic designers who they worked in all of the graphic design subjects.
Another reason which deserves some words here is that people with the determined subject are very successful in their life than the others. The noteworthy refreshingly intelligible statistics, which are revealed by a recent social research conducted in our country, show that a high percentage of people who have knowledge in one specific field are the ones who can manage and control the situations and conditions which they encountered with. For instance, an architecture who is expert in his career he can conveniently focus on his work and on the other hand manage an architect studio without any struggle or problem.
To put it briefly, if one weighs the merits and demerits of the aforementioned statement, one soon realizes that zooming on special subject and field has very advantages and also in the clear language, the more focus on the knowledge of the specific subject the more benefits and success will be gained.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 399, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... or they focus on one specific subject. However most of us aware about that anyone who ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 593, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...er graphic designers who they worked in all of the graphic design subjects. Another rea...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, briefly, but, first, however, if, so, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1893.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 375.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.048 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90466475404 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 599.4 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.1344086022 154% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.7888035054 48.9658058833 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.75 100.406767564 157% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.25 20.6045352989 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.41666666667 5.45110844103 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293222998936 0.236089414692 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117571141713 0.076458572812 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130878366363 0.0737576698707 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195591806831 0.150856017488 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0756335861516 0.0645574589148 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 11.7677419355 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 58.1214874552 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.1575268817 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.0537634409 143% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.