It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only 3 days a week for long hours
than to have a job where you work 5 days a week for shorter hours
It goes without saying that in this competitive and progressive world where we live, every individual is striving in their occupations in order to improve the quality of their lives. There has been a heated controversy among many people in the society whether to work longer hour for a limited number of days or to work five days a week for shorter hour. Personally speaking, I hold the opinion that working shorter hour for five days during a week is more acceptable, and the reasons to support my viewpoint are elaborated upon in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, it is crystal clear that working five days consecutively with shorter hours gives the person a sense of consistency. Nowadays, people prefer to have a set of routine tasks in order to have a clear schedule to adjust their lives on the basis of it. When a person choose to go on a job and spends five days in a row in the job environment, he or she will be provided with the beneficial sense of consistency which will positively affect not only the personal life of the employer but also will lead to the productivity of the company one works for. However, when a person opts for a three-days-a-week-job, he or she is more susceptible to suffer from the negative outcome of this decision. To put it into a more vivid picture, I worked five days in the university from 8 in the morning to 2 in the afternoon. Under such a circumstance, I had a clear-cut schedule and according to which I could use my evenings and do whatever I wished to do. However, because of all the changes that has happened in my life, I work in an office for 3 whole days which means from 7 in the morning to 7 in the afternoon. Although I can rest the other 4 days, it is like a torture to me to get back to work.
Furthermore, working 3 days a week with longer hour can have a negative effect on both the costumers and client of the company and the person. Working fewer numbers of day means that the position might be empty and no other employer fill that position until the next week when the job starts. There are definitely some clients who want their jobs to be accomplished on a special day. As an illustration, I needed the signature of a vice-president of the company in order to get the patent of my project. Unfortunately, whenever I went to the company in order to visit the person in charge, the secretary would told me that he did not come to the firm today. When I asked the reason, I found out that he was working only one day from early in the morning till late in the night. When I came back on the specific day that the secretary assured me the principal would be his office, surprisingly I saw a long queue of people who had the same problem as I did. Therefore, working more days in a week provide clients and customers a more efficient way to deal with their problems.
In conclusion, having considered the aforementioned reasons into account, I believe that working for shorter hours during five days is more beneficial since it provides the person a sense of balanced life with consistency and it will also increase the productivity and efficiency of the job both for the person and client.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 610, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'tell'
Suggestion: tell
...e person in charge, the secretary would told me that he did not come to the firm tod...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 93.0 52.1666666667 178% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2589.0 1977.66487455 131% => OK
No of words: 579.0 407.700716846 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.47150259067 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.90534594407 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7876910339 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 212.727598566 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.452504317789 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 834.3 618.680645161 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.5763604195 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.45 100.406767564 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.95 20.6045352989 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.422722323251 0.236089414692 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131829803482 0.076458572812 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0969117145722 0.0737576698707 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.290717318446 0.150856017488 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420676279772 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.1575268817 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.24 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.