It is sometimes said that borrowing money from a friend can harm or damage the friendship. Do you agree? Why or why not? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer.
I disagree with the statement that borrowing money from a friend could harm or damage the relationship. I feel this way for many reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, borrowing and lending could build trust, honesty and reliability between partners. To illustrate, if a friend can count on me to give him some money when he needs it, this will help us to feel that we will be for each other in hard times and will provide meaningfulness for the relationship. Moreover, when the borrowing side return the money back to his or her friend, this will make the lender feel how honest and truthful his friend is. My own experience is a perfect example on this. When I used to work at a grocery store last year, one of my coworkers was buying something and was checking out using his credit card. However, his payment tender was denied many times and he felt embarassed since the check-out process took a long time and there was a line of people waiting behind him. As I was standing and watching what was going on, I decided to pay for him with my credit card. He promised me he would pay me back the money next morning. When we saw each other on the next day, I found him bringing back the money and thanking me for what I did. Before this incident, we were just coworkers and our relationship was only superficial. Nevertheless, after this happened, we got even closer to each other since he found me a reliable friend who would not hesitate to help when there is a calamity and I found him a trustworthy honest person when he decided to pay back the money.
Secondly, strong commitment to preserve the relationship is key to get over any financial issues. Even though asking a friend for money and getting a rejection or taking money from a friend and never repay back might slightly erode trust, a well-established relationship, good communication and understanding between colleagues could relatively resolve these kinds of problem. For instance, if one side was not able to offer help, they may have an excuse and the other side may be understanding and not judgmental. Same applies when a partner is not capable of paying their debt. if the relationship is strong enough, they would work it out together and find a mutual understanding. For example, When I was in high school, I lent some money to one of my classmates since he asked for help. after I waited for him to pay me back, he never did. Consequently, I tried to talk to him about it but I discovered that he was actually going through a really tough time. As a result, I got to pick up the whole picture and I even forfeited this amount of money.
To conclude, I oppose the idea that loans between close friends could permanently destroy the relationship. This mainly due to the fact that open-minded persons are able to overcome these minor things with commitment and dedication to their relationship.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 478, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...y have an excuse and the other side may be understanding and not judgmental. Same applies when a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 580, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...er is not capable of paying their debt. if the relationship is strong enough, they...
^^
Line 3, column 790, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: After
... my classmates since he asked for help. after I waited for him to pay me back, he nev...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 255, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t and dedication to their relationship.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, consequently, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, really, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance, i feel, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 76.0 43.0788530466 176% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2381.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 517.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60541586074 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76839952204 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73550344499 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497098646035 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 732.6 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 9.59856630824 198% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 13.0 3.51792114695 370% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9992559474 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2083333333 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5416666667 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0991769692588 0.236089414692 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0332800680729 0.076458572812 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495452644695 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0816729386855 0.150856017488 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608582308294 0.0645574589148 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.