People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who focus on one skill only.
Skills, expertise helping us accomplish jobs, are developed throughout our lives and the process to master a certain skill usually consumes considerable time and energy. Therefore, some people hold the view that focusing only on one skill is better than cultivating different skills for people who want to succeed. However, I disagree with this idea and vehemently cling to the view that people are supposed to develop many skills on the way to success. I will explain the detailed reasons in the following paragraphs.
What should be prioritized first is that one person needs to take up different roles according to his position in the relationship. Being a father, he is required to learn how to educate his baby, helping him to grow healthy; being a coder, programming skills come the first absolutely; being a team member, he needs to develop interpersonal skills, exchanging his thoughts with others freely. There, people have to develop different skills to live in the net of relationships. On the contrary, you may feel lonely, just like an island in the sea, if only concentrating on solely one skill. After a long time, depression and anxiety would take up the place of happiness, driving you to a frustrating destination.
Secondly, you still need to develop diverse skills to be more successful even if just focusing on the work in the company. It is known that interdisciplinary expertise and skills are attached to great importance today since solving a real problem thoroughly requires people to break down the wall between different subjects. One of my teachers had introduced a vivid example before. He had a classmate majoring in physics at the university. In addition to examining those physics theories and experimenting, he also developed programming skills synchronisly. When he furthered his study in the UK, he invented software to deal with the data gained by the scanning telescopes, visualizing the data. He gained a.reputation after realizing his goal and made a lot of money by teaching others to use the software. And then he built a company, maintaining the software and providing comprehensive help. Expertise to manage a company was needed to organize the company and he dared to develop this skill quickly, running the company well.
It's admitted that we can't develop all skills at once, but we can develop them one by one referring to our needs rather than limiting ourselves to only one skill.
To conclude, I believe that developing diverse skills contribute more to a successful life compared with just cultivating a single skill.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 22, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...e company well. Its admitted that we cant develop all skills at once, but we can ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, well, in addition, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2159.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 422.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11611374408 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95078888612 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559241706161 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 683.1 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4308707489 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.95 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.446865503283 0.236089414692 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122855220038 0.076458572812 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13402219055 0.0737576698707 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264473089974 0.150856017488 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111481197947 0.0645574589148 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.