Providing Internet access is just as important as other services, such as building roads, so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost.
After entering the internet era, we almost cannot live without the internet, making the internet as important as other public infrastructures, such as roads. Under this circumstance, some people hold the view that governments should offer internet access to all of their citizens at no cost. However, in my opinion, I think it is unreasonable to require governments to provide internet service for free just because it has the same importance as other public resources, moreover, its features make it unlikely for governments to provide internet access to all of their citizens.
What should be prioritized is that those public resources like roads are not provided for us at no cost. It is known that we pay tax, a small part of our salaries, to governments and taxes is the money that governments use to construct infrastructure facilities for us. Therefore, internet access cannot be supplied to us for free too since it costs a considerable amount of money to build and governments need our money to do so.
What should be equally mentioned is that the internet service is more personal and customized than other public resources, which makes it hard to be provided for free. To begin with, the internet service providers need to transmit the data requested by you to your phone or computer, which can be compared to delivering what you want to purchase from the supermarket to your home instead of just laying them on shelves in the supermarket. What can be known from this analogy is that the internet service is a personal and superior service. In the contrast, other public services like roads are more public. In detail, there is no need for governments and construction companies to build a road leading to where you want to go. Moreover, the internet service is a customized service due to the different requirements of different people. To be more specific, a video game streamer needs an internet service having a big bandwidth to support a high resolution like 4k in his live stream while a writer only needs internet access to surf on the internet, collecting writing materials. Due to the different requirements of people mentioned above, the internet providers need to build routes accordingly which costs huge amounts of money.
Admittedly, while it is still a hard thing for most governments to supply their residents with internet service for free, some developed countries' governments have the capability to provide basic internet service to residents at no cost. For example, Singapore has launched a plan to cover the whole country with wireless internet service and provide basic internet service for their citizens for free, which is a promising plan.
To conclude, I think there is no need for governments to provide internet access to their residents due to its rising importance while it is a good envision to have free internet access covering every place across the world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 220, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...and taxes is the money that governments use to construct infrastructure facilities ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, for example, i think, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2434.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 483.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03933747412 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68799114503 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83974962067 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.449275362319 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 767.7 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.9355620046 48.9658058833 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.176470588 100.406767564 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4117647059 20.6045352989 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.29411764706 5.45110844103 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.516148229385 0.236089414692 219% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.185150964366 0.076458572812 242% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0994382095782 0.0737576698707 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.322383164173 0.150856017488 214% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116899092626 0.0645574589148 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 11.7677419355 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.