*Question: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who focus on one skill only. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In such a civilized society, in of several disagreements, people have in various areas so far as one’s view goes, one point everybody approves upon the importance of success. This owing fact it human’s natural desire become a successful person in society. Two sides often form in this regard. Those who trust knowing numerous skills better, while others who think having only one skill superior another choice. I personally myself among the first group. Among many reasons one can give for this point, two conspicuous reasons will be elaborated through ensuing lines.
My first reason for a person knowing many skills more successful if the person knows many skills will be a more popular attraction. Because if the person knows so many things, he can impress everyone by helping them. For example, my neighbor knows cooking gardening very well she always helps me whenever I have got problem while I am cooking or my plants look wilted weak all person who leaves in our apartment come for help in same.
My second reason for a person learns many skills more successfully if a person learns many skills he will be able to make friends from many different fields might be supportive for the future. Because if you know so many people you can get information about other fields to use them for your work or job other opportunities you can get from them. For instance, when my friend was in graduate school he was involved in many social physical activities because he made lots of friends from those fields. When he was searching for a job, he found a connection with the chairperson of a multinational company who offered him a job with a very high salary reputation.
Another reason if you learn only one skill your knowledge will be limited it will always be a bug in your head. But by knowing many skills you can live easily anywhere with those skills around the world. For example one of my best friend who was always focused studies. When she moved with her family, he doesn't know how to use a simple vacuum cleaner or microwave, because she always had fights with family.
In conclusion, there numerous reasons which can be enough to substantiate my view. Based on the given reasons above, which being productive getting job more easily, it can be those know numerous skills more successful than those who concentrate on the task.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 414, Rule ID: PRP_RB_NO_VB[1]
Message: Are you missing a verb?
...ly one skill superior another choice. I personally myself among the first group. Among many reaso...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 136, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ls he will be able to make friends from many different fields might be supportive for the futu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 306, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ies. When she moved with her family, he doesnt know how to use a simple vacuum cleaner...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 379, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put between 'had' and 'fights'.
Suggestion: had always fights
...acuum cleaner or microwave, because she always had fights with family. In conclusion, there nu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, second, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, you know
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1953.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 405.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82222222222 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48361679518 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525925925926 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2709732892 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.789473684 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3157894737 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.10526315789 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290513469708 0.236089414692 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946042493925 0.076458572812 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072040401676 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175494220146 0.150856017488 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475537408388 0.0645574589148 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.