the rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict.
It is widely accepted that nowadays governments play an important role in making the new rules to control the behavior of people. Some people may hold the view that rules should be strict. Some other, nonetheless, take an opposite point and believe that rules should not be too strict for the young people. Personally, I have a penchant toward the latter. In the next two paragraphs I will aptly delve into my reasons and I will cogently substantiate this perspective.
The first aspect to point out is that the societies should not make too restrict rules because in some cases it would have bad effects on the younger generation. Accordingly, to have a progress in a society they should not put people under the pressure. In fact, this is a win-win game where not only people would accept the rules, but also the society would enjoy the progress in their country. It may sound a bit far-fetched at first, but it is based on scientific evidence. Had young people not been able to be under the pressure from the society side, they would have not denied the rules and they would respect to it. As Molavi an exalted entrepreneur one said and I am quoting " People are like bird in the hands of society, if they squeeze them, they would hurt ".
Another equally noteworthy point in corroborating my stance is that young people would feel annoyance in a society with more restrict rules. People always need to have some freedom for their morals. My own experience is a compelling example in this notion. When I was in Iran, we had to prevent from having a boyfriend and it was bad if a cop sees you with your boyfriend. The more restrict rules, the more neglecting it. If one weighs the merits and demerits of it, one soon realizes that restrict rules does not prevent the crimes and bad effects in the society so they should modify the restriction instead of expecting too restrict rules.
Finally, yet importantly, it is like a double-sided sword. People sometimes need to be under the restrict rules to prevent from different kinds of crimes. But young people mostly do not like it. Real problems will be tackled down only by being together so for having a better society sometimes we need to have patience.
To recapitulate, based on the aforementioned argues, one can draw the conclusion that having more flexible rules in a societies can benefit young people in many ways, from having more freedom to decrease the level of being under pressure of the society; actually, there are other reasons and examples elaborating this idea which are not mentioned above due to the dearth of time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 69, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to restrict'?
Suggestion: to restrict
...t is that the societies should not make too restrict rules because in some cases it would ha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 184, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'progress'.
Suggestion: progress
...ounger generation. Accordingly, to have a progress in a society they should not put people...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 624, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to restrict'?
Suggestion: to restrict
...fy the restriction instead of expecting too restrict rules. Finally, yet importantly, it is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 93, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...word. People sometimes need to be under the restrict rules to prevent from different kinds o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 117, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a society' or simply 'societies'?
Suggestion: a society; societies
...sion that having more flexible rules in a societies can benefit young people in many ways, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, actually, also, but, finally, first, if, may, nonetheless, so, in fact, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 9.8082437276 224% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2150.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 454.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73568281938 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55286628682 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484581497797 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 672.3 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.0123956418 48.9658058833 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7272727273 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6363636364 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244055197455 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0739993765368 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652454650334 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140499735931 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275448525685 0.0645574589148 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.