For schools, assessing teachers’ teaching efficiency is a very important issue. But is it better for other teachers to assess or let students assess teachers?
Generally, teachers have a leading job in our society, for they are the main executive members of the educational system, so their teaching method and efficiency is of great importance. In this regard, there should be a person who is capable of assessing teachers' performance. Some people believe that other teachers can assess a teacher better, others think that students should be involved in the assessment process. I personally agree with the former one for some reasons among which other teacher's experience and having an objective point of view are the most important.
Firstly, teachers have more valuable experiences compared to students. They have spent a lot of years teaching, and have quite a few valuable experiences about how to deal with students, how to teach them responsibility and how to organize the class to name but a few. In addition, they have been trained some fundamental skills relevant to these issues during their educations. On the other hand, students are incompetent, and have no idea about the state-of-the-art methods. Hence, in comparison with mature teachers they might not be able to consider all aspects of a successful educational system.
Secondly, other teachers' opinion can be an objective criteria rather than the students' itself. Students, especially at very young ages, are not aware of the blessing of the difficulties that their teacher make them come through. In other words, teachers strive to teach students some valuable life lessons such as persistence and perseverance. Although, it may be frustrating for students to cope with hard work at the moment, later it will bring about strength and wisdom for them in the future. Therefore, students cannot provide a fair assessment of their teacher's performance. Thus, in this situation other teachers' comment about the teaching efficiency would be more reliable rather than the students'.
Taking all above mentioned arguments into consideration, it can be concluded that other teachers' assessment about the teaching performance is more effective than that of students. This opinion is not only the result of years of teaching experience, but also is completely objective. Every educational system should enjoy this opportunity for assessment to achieve the best outcome.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 17, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
... educational system. Secondly, other teachers opinion can be an objective criteria ra...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 54, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'criterion'?
Suggestion: criterion
...er teachers opinion can be an objective criteria rather than the students itself. Studen...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 89, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...eration, it can be concluded that other teachers assessment about the teaching performan...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, in addition, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1920.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 358.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36312849162 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90400712619 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539106145251 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7800206336 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.666666667 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61111111111 5.45110844103 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405136687764 0.236089414692 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138741350454 0.076458572812 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.097077705589 0.0737576698707 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.272983155459 0.150856017488 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129964729654 0.0645574589148 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.