Should a city try to preserve its old, historic buildings or destroy them and replace them with modern buildings?
Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
Nowadays people do not stop debating about whether we should keep historic building safe or we should destroy them to build new ones. Although it seems plausible at first glimpse that building new structures rather than those old buildings is a reasonable decision since every city needs more and more new buildings, I would counter this point of view due to some reasons. I will enlarge on what I mean in this essay.
Above all, those old, historic buildings can make a huge benefit for every city. To be more exact, city council should make a good plan for those building to attract people and tourists. Turkey is a compelling example of that. There are many old mosques in different cities of Turkey and they try to preserve them because those mosques can entice tourist to go there. Tourism has been a fascinating method of making profit for Turkey for several years. Therefore, those historic buildings should not be destroyed.
The second reason which deserves some words is that those historic buildings demonstrate the culture of a city and we cannot turn our backs to the older tradition of our cities. To clarify this point, those buildings are the features of a city without which the city will lose its background. People often know each city by its history and its special culture and those buildings define these characteristics. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter is profoundly influenced by my own experience. My city has an old mosque which is more than one thousand years old. Our mayor made a decision to renovate it last year because it is a big sign of our city’s personality and our city are known by that.
Another subtle point which I should deem lies on the fact that cities often have a bunch of void places where can be used to erect modern buildings. As a result, there is no need to destroy those historic places which its advantages outweigh disadvantages.
To sum up, based on aforementioned arguments explored in this essay, I highly recommend that those old, historic building should be kept safe.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, second, so, therefore, i mean, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1694.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 355.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77183098592 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54906076265 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549295774648 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6703249049 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1111111111 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7222222222 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 5.45110844103 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339462655891 0.236089414692 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104714693079 0.076458572812 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613696264733 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179107614801 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419627912965 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.