Should governments spend more money on improving roads and highways, or should governments spend more money on improving public transportation (buses, trains, subways)? Why? Use specific reasons and details to develop your essay.
Undoubtedly, governments have different issues to prioritize when it comes to disbursing budget. While it may differ for governments from country to country, I believe that public transporrtation expansion is an itegral exception issue for all of them directly or indirectly. In what follows, I will delve into my reasons.
First of all, public transportation system and its effect on societies take such an essential attention when we think about environment protection, which is a very serious problem for all humans. Since all vehicle for transprtation uses different types of fossil fuels like oil, coal, or natural gases; they have a heavy carbon-footprint, which is the main reason of global warming. Consequently, our planet suffers from raising sea level , climate change and many natural disasters following the global warming. When we can alleviate these huge worries by decreasing the fossil fuel usage, it shows the importance of this critical issue. Governments must attempt to solve that by investing on using public transportaions that uses clean energy such as electrical power or other renewable resources. As a result, people encourage to leave their private cars at home, when such a environment-friendly buses and trains are accessible and easy to use for them. In the end all humans will have a suitable air to breath and suitable environment to live.
Second of all,allocating money to improve the public transportation is a superb way to spend money of tax-payers. Since most of people, especially low-income ones are in more desprate need of such help, authorities can disperse all common-wealth equally by providing population with a well-developed transportation system. To put this into more vivid perspevtive, some minority of people such as disabled people who cannot use their own private cars, rely just on these buses and trains to commute or travel. Of course, the decision makers in our countries must prioritise these folks. And improving the public transportations which support these minorities is one of the most principal responsibilities of those governers for people.
In conclusion, I personally believe that government should spend a wealth amount of money to improve public transportation systems. This is because we help to preserve and protect our palnet by useing less private cars when we have a wonderfull busses and trains and because it results in an equal distribution of money and subsidiaries for all people especially who are needy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Undoubtedly, governments have different ...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ollows, I will delve into my reasons. First of all, public transportation syst...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 405, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... reason of global warming. Consequently, our planet suffers from raising sea leve...
^^
Line 2, column 448, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ur planet suffers from raising sea level , climate change and many natural disaste...
^^
Line 2, column 840, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'leaving'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: leaving
...esources. As a result, people encourage to leave their private cars at home, when such a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 887, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...e their private cars at home, when such a environment-friendly buses and trains a...
^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ath and suitable environment to live. Second of all,allocating money to improv...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 22, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , allocating
...ronment to live. Second of all,allocating money to improve the public transportat...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...way to spend money of tax-payers. Since most of people, especially low-income ones are in more...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 496, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'commuting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: commuting
...rs, rely just on these buses and trains to commute or travel. Of course, the decision make...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lities of those governers for people. In conclusion, I personally believe that...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, may, second, so, well, while, in conclusion, of course, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2097.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 393.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3358778626 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21475030866 2.67179642975 120% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582697201018 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 653.4 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3219393292 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.352941176 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1176470588 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05882352941 5.45110844103 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 5.5376344086 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239271930576 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0781721303001 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0981869084189 0.0737576698707 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153061978611 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0833662675156 0.0645574589148 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 11.7677419355 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.