Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed (damaged) by human activity. Others feel that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live. What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Earth is one of the most important place for living creatures incluing humans, animals and plants. A lot of human activity that has been done had a trendemous effect in it weather it was good or bad. Some people believe that earth is being harmed by human activity. Other disagree. In my point of view I believe that human have a harmful impact on earth. I feel this way for two important reasons.
To begin with, in the last two decades a lot of campaign and varieties activity were held to increase the human awareness toward the environment and the role of human on it. One of the most common example that mostly everobody knows is the Global warming. This comes from the deplate of the ozon in the stratosphere allowing the dangerous sun rais (uv) to reach the earth` surface and causing a lot harmfull effect.
For example, I saw one documentary on TV, where some German scientist were measuring the harmful effect that human are making to their environment and all of those activites increase the global warming. The scientists mentioned that emission of carbon monoxide that comes from burining fuels and wood increase the air pollution in which we live. They mentioned that if preventive measures and activity would not start the earth would be the place which would not support the human life on it anymore.
Secondly, the life that is supported on the forest is decreasing and endangering the ecosystem cycle. With the industrialization of the world a lot of forest are being cut which is being used for human purposes such as furniture, decorations, house making. The deforsetification has a huge role in the formation of the oxygen that is crucial to sustain the life on Earth. Further more this would cause the destinction of the animals living on these spaces.
For example, when I was kid me and my family went to visit my grand father in village every weekend. I remember that there used to be a beauful mountine with a lot of trees like pine and different animals. From the last visit that I did I remember that all that beautiful view that I had on my mind disepared, the trees were cut and now it looked like a field were only part of the trees root were left
These activities destroyed and had a catastrophic effect in a lot of parts of the world.
To sum up, humans had always been responsible for all the disturbance that has caused the Earth. The use of fuels for heat, and wood made the environment that we live more dangerouse and less livable. I recommend that immediate measures should be taken to prevent the Earth.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 40, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun campaign seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of campaigns'.
Suggestion: a lot of campaigns
... To begin with, in the last two decades a lot of campaign and varieties activity were held to in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 80, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a lot of campaign and varieties activity were held to increase the human awarenes...
^^
Line 7, column 370, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and now it looked like a field were only part of the trees root were left Thes...
^^
Line 7, column 404, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e only part of the trees root were left These activities destroyed and had a cat...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, second, secondly, so, for example, i feel, such as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.0286738351 209% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2110.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 452.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66814159292 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61719211614 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484513274336 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 668.7 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.3766913541 48.9658058833 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.476190476 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5238095238 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.09523809524 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.53405017921 154% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291078701241 0.236089414692 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0896914173481 0.076458572812 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0843069912421 0.0737576698707 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140508248665 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0958349485761 0.0645574589148 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 40, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun campaign seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of campaigns'.
Suggestion: a lot of campaigns
... To begin with, in the last two decades a lot of campaign and varieties activity were held to in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 80, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a lot of campaign and varieties activity were held to increase the human awarenes...
^^
Line 7, column 370, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and now it looked like a field were only part of the trees root were left Thes...
^^
Line 7, column 404, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e only part of the trees root were left These activities destroyed and had a cat...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, second, secondly, so, for example, i feel, such as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.0286738351 209% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2110.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 452.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66814159292 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61719211614 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484513274336 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 668.7 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.3766913541 48.9658058833 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.476190476 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5238095238 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.09523809524 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.53405017921 154% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291078701241 0.236089414692 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0896914173481 0.076458572812 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0843069912421 0.0737576698707 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140508248665 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0958349485761 0.0645574589148 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.