Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed by human activity. Others feel that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live. What is your opinion?
I do agree that earth is being harmed by human activists. The prime reason for such an agreement is that man was the inventor of pollution, global warming, emission of green house gases into atmosphere, inducing soil erosion and other man-made disasters. The human society literally destroyed the ecological balance thereby subjecting to ozone holes, extinction of rare species and other miserable facts which we can understand that without their dangerous practices, the system would have been functioned perfectly.
It's been argued that many such methodologies were undertaken to ensure the well-being of them, but its equally wrong. For example, a scientist discovered a way of killing pesticides by introducing a pest-killer. His thought behind the invention will be avoiding plants being eaten by insects and increase vegetation and cultivation. this as an overview seems to be an worthy investment, but what are the impacts. The factory which produces such a thing will eventually emit poisonous gases into the atmosphere which will lead to animal and human death.
The earth has its own underwater levels which are necessary for the survival of living organisms in that region but due to certain on-demand inventions like water driller which sucks water from ground and serving the needy for a cost, eliminates the purpose of fulfilling a customer's need but on a environmental perspective it has decreased the groundwater level which will lead to deserted sand and making the soil incapable of harvesting any corps.
The increased population in the last few decades resulted in human activists to jump in deforestation. starting from their basic needs like wood, coal, and types of furniture, the man started to destroy trees. Even the animals were hunted for their skin and flesh which is a potential thread to our bio-diversity. Though such practices were there before the evolution of modern human, after the automation industries came into the picture, they multiplied a lot.
Every human must think in a way that earth is his own family and whatever threat he is doing will, in turn, affect his generation. It's not that the inventions should not be made for betterment but adequate recycling of wastes for those must also be invented simultaneously. If we develop anything keeping this in mind, we won't end up in making our environment a polluted and decaying one.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 334, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...nd increase vegetation and cultivation. this as an overview seems to be an worthy in...
^^^^
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...vation. this as an overview seems to be an worthy investment, but what are the imp...
^^
Line 5, column 297, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...e of fulfilling a customers need but on a environmental perspective it has decrea...
^
Line 7, column 2, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... incapable of harvesting any corps. The increased population in the last few de...
^^^
Line 7, column 105, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Starting
...man activists to jump in deforestation. starting from their basic needs like wood, coal,...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 132, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...g will, in turn, affect his generation. Its not that the inventions should not be m...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2003.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 386.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18911917098 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83783783525 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621761658031 0.524837075471 118% => OK
syllable_count: 617.4 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 90.6860785554 48.9658058833 185% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.1875 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.45110844103 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177197403008 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601141720805 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706375168993 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0935063223108 0.150856017488 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366687331741 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 11.7677419355 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.01818996416 121% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.