Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
The animals are the beautiful giving of nature and our motherland, and saving them is our duty in order to retain the nature and its beauty. Destroying the land of endangered animals for farms, housing, and industry for our human needs is really not up to point. Therefore, i disagree with this point and the reason for this I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, the animals which are about to endangered need to be saved from becoming extinct as they are the symbol of glorious nature in which we live and if they vanished completely there would be many in-consequences. The forests which are being preserved for the animals would decrease as humans would cut them down as no animals would be resident there. Decrease in the forests would increase the global warming and this would impact greatly on the human's daily life. This will lead to the depletion of the nature and many serious problems will start to arise, therefore it can be clearly envisioned, that not saving the land for endangered animals would cause many problems.
Secondly, according to my opinion there is a lots of free and unused land which is neither resident to any animals, can be used by humans for farming, housing, industry or any other personal purpose instead of taking away the land from endangered animals and making them extinct.
For instance, in India the lion can be considered as an endangered animal as it's number is limited to only few thousands and that to only in the state of Gujarat. This Lions are the prestige of India as they are the only left Asiatic lions in the country and if the land they are resident to are occupied for the personal use, they might be extinct from the country and this would be a great shame to country itself. Therefore allowing them to live peacefully on their land, humans can choose to yield the land which is unused and can make it use for personal purpose instead of taking away the small piece of land from endangered animals.
In conclusion, I think that the specific land should be saved for the endangered animals instead of using it for the personal use of humans as it would not be appropriate of being selfish and letting the endangered animals to go extinct, as they are the most important part of the nature and saving them is our duty.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 275, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...s is really not up to point. Therefore, i disagree with this point and the reason...
^
Line 5, column 35, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are a lots'?
Suggestion: there are a lots
...s. Secondly, according to my opinion there is a lots of free and unused land which is neithe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 44, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lot' or simply 'lots'?
Suggestion: a lot; lots
...ondly, according to my opinion there is a lots of free and unused land which is neithe...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 163, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...d that to only in the state of Gujarat. This Lions are the prestige of India as they...
^^^^
Line 6, column 417, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...uld be a great shame to country itself. Therefore allowing them to live peacefully on the...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, i think, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1894.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 407.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65356265356 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40721547745 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.420147420147 0.524837075471 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 601.2 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.1344086022 164% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.7291890957 48.9658058833 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.833333333 100.406767564 157% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.9166666667 20.6045352989 165% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.45110844103 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245392542581 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119060608191 0.076458572812 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0813963447662 0.0737576698707 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173942816603 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0574211324742 0.0645574589148 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 11.7677419355 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 58.1214874552 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.1575268817 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.0537634409 151% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.