Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only do what they know how to do well

Essay topics:

Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only do what they know how to do well.

In todays' progressive and competitive world where we live in, no one can turn a blind eye to the significance of being successful. When it comes to question that whether its better to take risks or not, there are different ideas. Some people inclined toward the idea that taking a lot of risks is beneficial to the achieve success, others hold just the opposite idea; they think its better to do what is person is sure he/she can easily handle that. From my vantage point, the first group carries more weight. In the following paragraphs, I will explain my reasons.

First, taking risks and doing new thing allows the person to discover so many valuable experiences which could help them achieving high level performance and success. For more explanation, by trying new things a person would reach to astonishing findings that it was impossible to understand them from books or other information sources. By so doing, one increases the chance to find so many ways to do just one task and choose the best method to do that. Although, at first glance, trial and error could be frustrating and a whole wasting of time, but after that, due to experiences the person have gained, she/he always have the chance to choose fastest way to accomplish our works. Experience is gold, and taking risks equip one to this valuable gold, therefore its not surprising that someone who is assertive enough to take risky decisions become a successful one.
Secondly, taking risk is a good implication of openness, eagerness and consistency as well, which are other factors of prosperity. To be more specific, people who try new things and are open to new experiences also are assertive. As they don't afraid of failure, they seem to be more consistent and don’t give up until they get what they want. This characteristic also implies eagerness. All these features aside with risk taking could predict big breakthrough feats, if not immediately, but absolutely. For illustrate, imagine someone who always cling to old cliches and because of an extreme obsess about failure couldn’t do new things, and compare such person with one who is assertive and don’t give up, even if his/her plans completely break down. Its obvious that the second one will finally find his way to be successful.
In conclusion, I think for being successful it is better to be take risks because it increases our knowledge about our work, and gives us more choices to decide which one is the best way to do our task. As well, openness to new experiences in a good implication for existence of other factor of being successful such as eagerness, consistency and avoiding from wrong stereotypes.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 632, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'choose the fastest'.
Suggestion: choose the fastest
...ve gained, we always have the chance to choose fastest way to accomplish our works. Experience...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 239, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...experiences also are assertive. As they dont afraid of failure, they seem to be more...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, i think, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2195.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 450.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87777777778 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7078532338 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546666666667 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 675.9 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.525795151 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.526315789 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6842105263 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.31578947368 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277370711405 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078887105604 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659949143876 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172803097089 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302106108678 0.0645574589148 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 632, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'choose the fastest'.
Suggestion: choose the fastest
...ve gained, we always have the chance to choose fastest way to accomplish our works. Experience...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 239, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...experiences also are assertive. As they dont afraid of failure, they seem to be more...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, i think, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2195.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 450.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87777777778 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7078532338 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546666666667 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 675.9 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.525795151 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.526315789 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6842105263 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.31578947368 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277370711405 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078887105604 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659949143876 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172803097089 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302106108678 0.0645574589148 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.