A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than
excellent knowledge of the subject being taught.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
I am agree with that a teacher’s ability to relate well with student is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught. There are two reasons to support my point of view. The one is the interactions between teacher and students plays a crucial element in the learning motivation, and the other is learning surroundings could affects learning quality.
First of all, how a teacher interact with students would have obvious influence on a student’s learning willingness. For instance, if a teacher only teach the knowledge on the book and does not ask did students really understand or have any other questions about what he/she says while he/she was teaching every time, the students could not express their difficulties and might not realize the information provided. Eventually, that would reduce the learning motivation of the students.
Secondly, an active learning environment which mainly formed by a teacher would promote the effect of learning. For example, giving opportunities to students to present their thought and discuss the issue with each other may activate the learning atmosphere. Under a good interaction with teacher, the quality of learning will be improved.
As a result, being a teacher, the capability of behaving well interact with the students is more important than what excellent knowledge they have. The statement is based on the conceptions of teacher should provide proper information what students need via communicating with them so that the students would have more intention to learn; besides, to enhance the learning effectiveness, a positive studying surroundings might be created by teacher.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 6, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
I am agree with that a teacher apos;s ability to r...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 353, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'affect'
Suggestion: affect
...he other is learning surroundings could affects learning quality. First of all, how a ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, for instance, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 43.0788530466 30% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 52.1666666667 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 1977.66487455 71% => OK
No of words: 263.0 407.700716846 65% => More words wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33460076046 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87222532614 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 212.727598566 71% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570342205323 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 618.680645161 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences, or put a space between two sentences.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.1753989674 48.9658058833 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.545454545 100.406767564 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9090909091 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9090909091 5.45110844103 200% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311813831975 0.236089414692 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139091721272 0.076458572812 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143389332248 0.0737576698707 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213054745815 0.150856017488 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112913263164 0.0645574589148 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.