Teachers were more valued and appreciated in the past more than today..
In today's progressive and sophisticated world that we live, education plays a critical role in order to develop a country. The more the teachers are valued, the more the society will be elaborate. Although some people think that teacher were more appreciated in the past, I personally stand on the opposite side of that position and believe that they are valued more in these days in comparison to the past. The reasons to support my argument will be discussed in the following paragraphs below.
First of all, teachers are more valued nowadays because of increasing the value of education. To be more exact, people, parents in particular, did not pay attention on getting degree like becoming graduated. As the time passed, individuals get to know about the importance of knowledge and education. Regard to that, since the teachers considered as the key factor for education, people understand the vital role of teachers gradually and that lead to increase the sense of gratitude among people in the society. So, the more the people become skilled and graduated in these days, the more they valued the teachers.
Secondly, teachers are appreciated because of this technological and competitive world. It is a crystal clear that the rate of high technology is increasing sharply and no one cannot ignore the role of social media such as TV and Internet in human being's lives. Regard to that, these social media help to better focus on teacher's role in the society and even their hard situation in some cases. So, people know their hard duty and it leads to better and sooner understand their hardworking. Like, for instance, if a teacher teaches in the rural areas of a city and faces to different problems and obstacle according to his job, people can see his hard time by a short video on social media for example, which is not occurred in the past. Thus, increasing the rate of technology lead to increase the sense of gratitude for teachers.
In conclusion, in spite of all others who think that teachers were valued more in the past, I strongly agree with that they are in a better position in the society now and more appreciated because of "increasing the value of education" as well as "increasing the rate of technology".
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 322, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...se social media help to better focus on teachers role in the society and even their hard...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 399, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... their hard situation in some cases. So, people know their hard duty and it leads...
^^
Line 13, column 38, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... In conclusion, in spite of all others who think that teachers were valued more...
^^
Line 13, column 247, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...;increasing the value of education' as well as 'increasing the rate of ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as well as, first of all, in some cases, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1888.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 381.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95538057743 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85346866036 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48031496063 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 602.1 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.5279252927 48.9658058833 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8125 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1875 5.45110844103 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382848124991 0.236089414692 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126144154872 0.076458572812 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139978217497 0.0737576698707 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262278066319 0.150856017488 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129095906991 0.0645574589148 200% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.