Technology has made children less creative than they are in past.Agree or disagree?
History of mankind proves the ability of humans to make advances in almost every field, be it arts or science or sports. Those days, children spend most of the time playing outdoors or involved in indoor activities like playing cards or clay molding. Kids before the 20th century were not exposed to technological devices whereas nowadays they use advanced objects better than their parents or grandparents. Hence, I disagree to the fact that technology has made children less creative than they were in past.
In every household, both the parents go for work and children are taken care of by maids or other family members. To pacify them, they are shown cartoon programs in TV and allowed to use mobile phone from a very young age. As a result of this, they are exposed to various information and daily happenings of the world. they acquire knowledge at a very young age which enables them to think out of the box.
Furthermore, exposure is at a great level, not only at home but also in schools and colleges. Adequate resources are available to enhance their intellectual skills. For example, most of the educational institutions offer English coaching classes to improve communication skills, sports activities during weekends to strengthen their body, abacus classes in the evenings to foster analytical skills and many more. Thus, students get a chance to be creative rather than to accept whatever is in store for them.
also, they don’t memorize lessons and have improved to the extent of writing answers in their own words. they participate in many events and join in mini projects at the school level. All these can make one to think that the creativity level increases with the advancement in the field of science and technology and does not decline it.
To put it in a nutshell, it can be stated that children nowadays tend to do smart work rather than the hard work done by their parents. also, they are capable of doing things differently as most of the great people do. Usage of mobile phones lead them to think of further advances that could be made.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 502, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...e children less creative than they were in past. In every household, both the pare...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 320, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...tion and daily happenings of the world. they acquire knowledge at a very young age w...
^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
...ept whatever is in store for them. also, they don't memorize lessons and h...
^^^^
Line 13, column 111, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
... of writing answers in their own words. they participate in many events and join in ...
^^^^
Line 17, column 137, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
...an the hard work done by their parents. also, they are capable of doing things diffe...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, so, then, thus, whereas, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1737.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 355.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89295774648 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54601142413 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597183098592 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2228360911 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7222222222 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27573902014 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840655996157 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153788608529 0.0737576698707 209% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137354612109 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107581332482 0.0645574589148 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.