TPO 55 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
Some people might disagree with the statement that, when group members who are working on a project communicate through in person rather than by email, they will produce better work for project. However, I think otherwise. I believe that it is better to communicate with colleagues in person about a project so, they will produce better work. This is because, it avoids misunderstanding among the members. Another, every group member shares their work contribution equally.
To begin with, when members of a project communicate in person, they produce better work by avoiding misunderstanding in less time. When students communicate through email with each other sometime misunderstandings occurred among members specially, who shares different ideas. These misunderstanding takes long time to resolve within long distance communication. But if the colleagues sit together with each other and talks in person they can easily communicate and clear their misunderstanding. For instance, when I was in my last year of graduation our chemistry teacher assigns us project with three other member of my class who share totally different perspectives. At first it was very hard for me to complete our assignment because we were sharing our ideas through emails and none of us came with the clear understanding. This had wasted our lots of time. So, when we decided to meet after the class and talked each other in person we completed our assignment in couple of days. This would not have been possible if we did not communicate in person. Therefore, when talking in person on our chemistry project, it brings out better work because we solved our miscommunication in less time.
In addition, the group member will contribute their work equally so, this will help to produce finer work for a project. The member working together on a project, feels more enthusiastic when they sit along and talk in person. The discussion together motivates the colleagues, and they contribute their part well in a group. For example, when my cousin was doing the project online, she faced lots of problem with her project as she was communicating with member through email. Her collegeues were not contributing their part properly. Therefore, she called a meeting for the project in her house so, all the member then get motivated and worked along . As a result, her hard work paid off and the collegues also contributed their part very well.
In conclusion, I personally believe that it is better to communicate in person with the colleguses or classmate instead of email to produce better work for project. This is because, it helps to understand each other well. Another, discussion on a group In person help to share each member their part equally.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 610, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'member' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'members'.
Suggestion: members
...her assigns us project with three other member of my class who share totally different...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 394, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun problem seems to be countable; consider using: 'lots of problems'.
Suggestion: lots of problems
...was doing the project online, she faced lots of problem with her project as she was communicati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 652, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...mber then get motivated and worked along . As a result, her hard work paid off and...
^^
Line 9, column 194, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or project. This is because, it helps to understand each other well. Another, dis...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2296.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 447.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13646532438 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92265503748 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.454138702461 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 695.7 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 9.59856630824 198% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.3884039808 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.84 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.88 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332336406003 0.236089414692 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10999786606 0.076458572812 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125145825053 0.0737576698707 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252188541466 0.150856017488 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0776760065134 0.0645574589148 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.