Universities should give the same amount of money to their students’ sports activities as they give to their university libraries.
University libraries are the most important part of an education process because students need to access some thorough sources to take advantages of their facilities. Some people believe that it’s better for universities to spend the same budget for libraries and sports activities. In my point of view libraries should be more funded for two significant reasons.
The first point I’d like to make is that as you know the primary and main purpose of a university is to educate people to be knowledgeable and get ready for future career. So, for reaching these goals students require to apply the library equipment and facilities to develop their wisdom. Universities should provide the best services for those who want to do and write a paper. For example a university that values on the library facilities its graduates will be more successful, by strong thesis, than the others. Therefore in my view it does not make sense to give the same amount of money for both university libraries and sports activities.
Another point I’d like to make is that students will utilize library facilities and appliance such as online journals, computers, internet system to write an effective essay. If universities exclude these services; therefore, students will not get opportunity to do research appropriately. For instance when I wanted to write my essay I’ve had to apply other college library services in the Tabriz because our college didn’t prepare sufficient and proper library.
In conclusion, not only universities are the original spot for development wisdom and being knowledgeable, but also they should play a pivotal role in students future career by providing well-facilitated libraries because the essay that is going to be written, using library resources, will be comprehensive
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
University libraries are the most import...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 86, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ant part of an education process because students need to access some thorough so...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re funded for two significant reasons. The first point I'd like to make is...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 228, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'applying'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: applying
...r reaching these goals students require to apply the library equipment and facilities to...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 526, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ful, by strong thesis, than the others. Therefore in my view it does not make sense to gi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rsity libraries and sports activities. Another point I'd like to make is t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, you know, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 52.1666666667 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1529.0 1977.66487455 77% => OK
No of words: 286.0 407.700716846 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34615384615 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97074632999 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 212.727598566 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566433566434 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.59856630824 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.8707251841 48.9658058833 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.416666667 100.406767564 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 5.45110844103 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258642243474 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103079688812 0.076458572812 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646779430715 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159583020098 0.150856017488 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0685863010001 0.0645574589148 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.