When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.
Communication between classmates or colleagues is essential for successful completion of a project work. Even though introduction of internet has enabled us to use e-mail to communicate with our group members while accomplishing a task, in person communication, still, helps us to perform a job more efficiently.
To begin with, emotional attachment between the group members is an important element which helps to perform a task with greater efficiency. Whether doing a class assignment or doing an official work, we need to consider the other group members as our family; this bondage among us helps to understand each other by enabling us to aware of the limitations and strengths of our other group members. By working as a family facilitates us to accomplish the task in hand more efficiently. For instance, few years ago I had to do a group project in my university for my environmental engineering course; we needed to do survey on our local restaurants about their sanitation facilities and submit a report accompanied by a group presentation on our survey. We, the group members, sat together to discuss about the task and understand our individual responsibilities. We acted like members of a family and at first analyzed the strength and weakness of each of us, and accordingly we distributed the task among us. While doing the task we regularly used to gather together to check our progress. When some of us failed to perform a job, other members of the group helped to do the job. This type of bonding of us helped to make a good report and presentation, and eventually all of us earned good credit. Without personal attachment it was not possible for us to do the assignment nicely.
Secondly, communicating with other group members helps to perform a job faster as we do not have to wait for the response of other group members which is the main drawback of emailing. While doing an official task, if we depend of email for performing task, then it would happen that we are waiting for the feedback of other group members, which is very frustrating and time consuming. Instead, if we meet together and discuss the job, it would assist us to perform the task in hand faster which is beneficial for the company. For example, if a group project require that one cannot complete a task without the response of other member, them it would happen that he have to wait until the other members go online and see his email and then reply. Meanwhile, this problem can easily be eliminated by attending in a place and co-relating with each other personally. Then there will be no time waste as well as there will be no misunderstanding also which is essential to perform a job being in a group.
In conclusion, to accomplish a group project smoothly and efficiently, we need to communicate with each other personally. This will help to increase the bonding among the group members and perform a job faster.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1010, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ingly we distributed the task among us. While doing the task we regularly used to gat...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 52.1666666667 148% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2414.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 500.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.828 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72870804502 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93907196237 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.442 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 751.5 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.5733152644 48.9658058833 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.7 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.45110844103 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139683481233 0.236089414692 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580910020677 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0771689288555 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126726320872 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703249102634 0.0645574589148 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.