When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.
With the popularity of Internet, the way people communicating with each other has been changed a lot in both academy or professional working area. Some people prefer to communicate on a project with classmates or colleagues facet-to-face. Others think that it is better to have discussions by e-mail. As far as I am concerned, I agree with the former point of view because of some reasons as below.
Firstly, communicating with team members face-to-face gives everyone a chance to express their views accurately. If there is a project that requires several people to work together. Every member of the team may have some personal ideas about this task. In this case, if they can sit together and discuss the project with each other, each of them can express their views completely and accurately. Therefore, they can quickly reach a consensus on this project and complete it on due. However, if people communicate by e-mail, it is hard to fully understand and support for what other people’s idea want to express and which is different from themselves. This makes it hard to carry out the project successfully. From the above discussion, face-to-face meetings give us an opportunity to express our views and understand the ideas of others.
Moreover, meeting in person can improve work efficiency. When team members communicate about a project personally, they will know the progress of the project. If there is a problem that is difficult to solve and causes the project to fall behind the schedule, people can work out a solution together. At the same time, sitting and communicating with other person can improve people's enthusiasm for work. When they see other people are working hard, they will put more efforts into their own assignments. But when people contact with others by e-mail, their problems cannot be solved in time. And when they are working alone, it is difficult for them to completely devote themselves into their project. Thus, people working in person can make project more likely to be succeed.
Last but not least, in some situations, people are unable to reply e-mail in time, which can cause problems being still unsolved and even delay the project. There are some conditions where people cannot respond to e-mail from their colleagues timely, such as their computer out of energy or they have other important things to do. In this case, the problem to be discussed in the e-mail would not been solved effectively. And the general plan of the project is going to be changed. Therefore, communicating about a project by e-mail can lead to a serious of problems.
To sum up, although the high technology brings us a lot of convenience, it is still an efficient mode for us to discuss a project with classmates or colleagues face-to-face. Because communicating in person is a better way to finish task than e-mail.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 113, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ance to express their views accurately. If there is a project that requires severa...
^^
Line 5, column 175, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... classmates or colleagues face-to-face. Because communicating in person is a better way...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 80.0 52.1666666667 153% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2368.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 476.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97478991597 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67091256922 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79523892331 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.455882352941 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 738.0 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.5538481345 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.7037037037 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6296296296 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.51851851852 5.45110844103 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389154327239 0.236089414692 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125243584744 0.076458572812 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0851016295632 0.0737576698707 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231290369718 0.150856017488 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0770766370646 0.0645574589148 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.