When employees feel that the management of their company is doing something wrong, what do you think is the best way for them to respond?
It is a critical important that the management of the company does things right. If I am the employee in a company and the management there is doing things wrong, personally, I would discuss with other co-workers first. There are two reasons, which I will explore more in the following essay.
To begin with, to let the colleagues working around me know that out company is taking the wrong steps. The gossips between the workers pass really fast. It will not take lots of time to let the most of the workers know about the action of the company. Additionally, the workers are the basic element to construct a company, so it is easier that lots of workers having question about the company’s management to make the company changes their policy. For example, if there are just one employee telling the boss of the company that their management is doing something wrong, the boss might not accept the concept because other hundred of the workers don’t have any problem with it. If the situation become opposite, however, only one employee doesn't have any question of the decision of the company. Then the boss should pay lots of effort to revise the decision that had made.
Moreover, employees of the unethical company could have more chance to conceal the information to the public or even the mass media. Nowadays, the media focus less on the business scandals, because lots of companies are the patron of the media. There are enormous of workers in the company and they will have relatives and families. If all of these people know about the things that the company than they could force the media to report and conceal the bad behaviors of the company. Therefore, the company’s positive image could be debacle and lots of consumers might not support or buy the products from this company.
In conclusion, I believe that the best way for the company to response for their management doing something wrong is to talking about what is going on with the employees there. Because the workers could force the company to revise their decision and conceal the truth to public which is the disaster for the dishonest company.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 488, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'employees'?
Suggestion: employees
...icy. For example, if there are just one employee telling the boss of the company that th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 745, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...me opposite, however, only one employee doesnt have any question of the decision of th...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, really, so, then, therefore, for example, in conclusion, talking about, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1773.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 367.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8310626703 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41926562957 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 212.727598566 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.452316076294 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 545.4 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5578480816 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.294117647 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5882352941 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76470588235 5.45110844103 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268617190005 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0886053824866 0.076458572812 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116527804724 0.0737576698707 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200847569623 0.150856017488 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115281571174 0.0645574589148 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.