Which one can make friendship stronger? Having a good time with your friend (Enjoy good time) Solving your problem with him or her (talk about problem) Supporting each other
In today's modern and sophisticated world, friendship is a vital part of people's lives. In this connection, there are several characteristics, which help friendship to become strong. Although some people prefer to have a pleasant time with friends, many other people believe that talking with a friend about obstacles can strengthen their friendship. There is still the third group who hold the view that friends should support each other to make a strong relationship. I agree with the second group's opinion, and I will analyze my reasons throughout this essay.
First, one needs the friend on whom they can rely on difficulties; hence, they prefer to maintain their friendship with one who solves their problems. To be more specific, when people face challenges in their lives, they need someone to support them by presenting useful solutions and help them to tackle problems, leading to a long-lasting friendship. According to my own experience, when I was a high school student, one of my classmates had difficulties in a math course, and she did not grasp the concepts of many subjects. One day, I spend a considerable amount of time explaining all topics precisely and presented solutions for each problem, which she could not solve, so much so that she understood math wonderfully. Therefore, she was inclined to continue her relationship with me since she knew that I was the person who supported her in arduous circumstances.
Second, when friends talk about their difficult situations in their lives, they become familiar with their private issues, thereby becoming intimate friends. To elucidate, if a person discusses with their friends to find solutions for secrets affairs, their friends will know about her privacy; hence, they feel close to each other. For example, when I was a university student, one of my classmates felt depressed, so I asked the reasons for her upset feelings. As she needed help, she was convinced to tell about her family situation; thus, it provides insight into all of her private issues. Therefore, as I have become familiar with her family conditions, I have gained a wealth of information about her private life and personality, which has led to establishing a firm relationship. As a result, we consider each other as a sister.
To conclude, while there are several arguments on each side, I profoundly believe that talking about obstacles with a friend can improve friendship. Not only do people need others' supports in complicated situations, but they also become familiar with their friends' secrets when they are talking about a solution.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 494, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'groups'' or 'group's'?
Suggestion: groups'; group's
...g relationship. I agree with the second groups opinion, and I will analyze my reasons ...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rted her in arduous circumstances. Second, when friends talk about their di...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, second, so, still, then, therefore, third, thus, while, for example, talking about, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2180.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 422.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16587677725 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88959254292 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518957345972 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 647.1 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.51792114695 284% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8808868982 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.111111111 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311144281973 0.236089414692 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102461643111 0.076458572812 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652249792256 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210306971685 0.150856017488 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310741641062 0.0645574589148 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.