Which one of the following values is the most important to share with a young child (5-10 years old)?
1. Being helpful 2. Being honest 3. Being well organized
In today’s convoluted world, the face of children nurturing has utterly changed compared to the past. Nowadays, assorted strategies of thriving are implemented to help children to grow in an excellent condition and to reach prosperous circumstances in the future. Be that as it may, which characteristic is of more critical importance to distribute with children relies upon the lens through which one is seeing and experiencing. A growing body of community members holds the conviction that being helpful or being honest is more vital than being well-organized to dedicate for children. I personally repudiate this idea and the rationale behind this perspective will be vindicated in the ensuing article.
The first and the most compelling reason lending credence to my point of view is associated with the importance of discipline in reach the pinnacle of success. Hardly can anyone deny the fact that humankind becomes habituated with a lot of subjects when they try to perform them in the childhood. As a matter of fact, no longer can adults become well-organized in their chores, on the account that so arranged children had been in the past. Needless to say, having had discipline in the public or private tasks provides for children an opportunity to become independent in a shorter time. As a result, experiencing independence would revolutionize their life economically and spiritually. As an illustration, noteworthy statistics of an article published in the Economics Magazine showed that one fifth of primary school children in developed countries have an intense inclination to imitate their parent’s behaviors, of whom more than 85% gained their parent’s values, due to learning these manners in the childhood.
Another imperative point which ought to be mulled over is concerned with striking outcomes of being well-organized in their next life stages. It goes without saying that disciplined individuals have an uncanny knack in decision making and leading the group works. In effect, they are more trustable for others; thus, they become a focal element of the cohort communities. Although someone has perceived it partially exaggerative, I concur that running into these cascade of pleasant circumstances boils down to enhancing their self-reliance and directing them to the road of success. Briefly, the more the children learn to be well-organized, the more they will be successful in the long run. These results provide further legitimacy for the idea that strong-willed persons have learned to become a disciplined individual in their primary life stages.
To wrap it up, it is more well-advised to state that neither being helpful, nor being honest could be considered as the most important features to share with the children. In my opinion, by having had well-organized value, not only do people guarantee their success in the coming steps, but they also would attain noticeable situations owing to being disciplined persons. Consequently, I highly suggest that parents should put more emphasis on discipline and arrangement to allot their children in order to make a blazing future for them.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, consequently, first, if, may, so, thus, well, as a matter of fact, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 78.0 52.1666666667 150% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2645.0 1977.66487455 134% => OK
No of words: 493.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36511156187 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71206996034 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11640034143 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 273.0 212.727598566 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553752535497 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 819.0 618.680645161 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2410967876 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.25 100.406767564 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.65 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.65 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28154388249 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0919907412008 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123778316852 0.0737576698707 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199394296508 0.150856017488 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0982848050014 0.0645574589148 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 11.7677419355 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 58.1214874552 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 10.9000537634 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 145.0 86.8835125448 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.