Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Views differ when it comes to the issue whether doing one task is satisfying for workers to do rather than doing so many tasks to do during the workday. I believe, however, spending time on so many assignments are by far advantageous for workers since it broadens their experiences and inspires them to succeed.
The first aspect of current discussion which demands a severe contemplation is that they can gain more detailed knowledge through working with so many duties. That is to say, confronting in some challenging situations help them expand their experience by acquiring vital information. Take the case of a worker who works for a construction building company. He could do the similar work every day, but this uneventful job makes him despondent and might be fed up with his job. Consequently, he cannot perform well due to reducing his performance during the workday. Tackling with some different tasks provide an opportunity to face coping situations and makes him well-experienced through his job. Thus, this achievement meets the manager's expectation and enables him to promote in his job.
A further more subtle point is that doing so many tasks make a motivation for workers to work hard. Hardly does anyone can make a progress without an incentive, which means they can easily get the sense of being satisfied by having some different duties. For example, a one can be exhausted from doing the same task and start to complain that wind up to personal conflicts in his job. Under this condition spending the time seems slower than the reality for him. Doing other obligations enables him to make a balance between duties and time management to maintain the schedule, and the passing of time feels faster for him. Even though they may find carrying out the plan tough, they soon notice its tangible benefits on their superb performance at their job. Thus, the sense of accomplishment which gained from doing things enhance their self-satisfaction.
To summarize, it should be emphasized workers by doing many several tasks during the day work can be satisfied which makes stimulation on their minds as well as expand their knowledge through arduous situations. It is high time we stopped overlooking the fact that highly trained workers earned their proper information from fulfilling various tasks through the workday.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 64, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...mes to the issue whether doing one task is satisfying for workers to do rather than doing so ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 731, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'managers'' or 'manager's'?
Suggestion: managers'; manager's
...s job. Thus, this achievement meets the managers expectation and enables him to promote ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 129, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'progress'.
Suggestion: progress
... work hard. Hardly does anyone can make a progress without an incentive, which means they ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, look, may, so, thus, well, for example, as well as, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1961.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 384.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10677083333 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80118165286 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552083333333 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3321540684 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.944444444 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277624837991 0.236089414692 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0861832278226 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0951297418509 0.0737576698707 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195897065098 0.150856017488 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0816422421861 0.0645574589148 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.