Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading passage. You have 20 minutes to type your response.
The reading states that fossil sources of energy have some serious problems, and nuclear energy is the solution and gives three reasons for support. However, the professor thinks that nuclear energy will not solve these problems and attacks each of the claims made by the author.
First, the reading states that the fuel that powers nuclear power plants is cheap compared to fossil fuels. However, the lecturer refutes this idea and states that nuclear energy is not cheap. Every nuclear plant needs more money for expertise than fossil plants do. Moreover, nuclear energy plants have to pay a lot of money for legislation. These fees will be paid to governments due to the risk of catastrophic events.
Second, the author claims that the process of creating nuclear energy is relatively safe. On the contrary, the lecturer rebuts this idea by explaining that accidents still happen. Although there are no such catastrophic results, a lot of hazardous effects are been recorded. For example, the nuclear plant in Pennsylvania had some leakage that didn’t affect society. However, it had to pay more than one billion dollars in order to fix the plant.
Third, the passage states that hazardous radioactive waste generated by nuclear power plants can be effectively managed. Again the lecturer disagrees. He says the waste is not easily controlled. Some of the waste has dangerous reproduced products like the 333p item. This one can be used in nuclear weapons! Furthermore, there are some high-level wastes that remain. These wastes need to be buried underground for more than 100 years which is a very expensive process.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 195, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...ays the waste is not easily controlled. Some of the waste has dangerous reproduced products...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, moreover, second, so, still, third, for example, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1366.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 265.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15471698113 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5230189808 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543396226415 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.3886635105 49.2860985944 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.8888888889 110.228320801 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7222222222 21.698381199 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 7.06452816374 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0517601429368 0.272083759551 19% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0170266472744 0.0996497079465 17% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0183254665701 0.0662205650399 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0360445653819 0.162205337803 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0196712135204 0.0443174109184 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 53.8541721854 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.0289183223 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.