Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific concerns presented in the reading passage.
Recently, there has been a ton of debate as to send humankind to Mars. More specifically, in regards to the passage, the writer puts forth the idea that traveling to Mars is has several problems that makes it almost impossible. In the listening passage, the lecturer is quick to point out there are some serious flaws in the writer's claims. In fact, the professor possesses opposite opinion of the writer, and addresses, in detail, the trouble with each point made in the reading passage.
First and foremost, the author of the the reading states that the distance between Mars and Earth is too far that takes time more than 2 years. This condition makes it difficult to carry abundant supply, such as water, oxygen, and food, to the crew. However, the professor stand in firmopposition to this claim. In the listening, for example, the professor states that they can use hydraponics, planting on water, as a solution. She goes on to say that the technique not only helps a crew to supply their own food, but also recycles water, and refreshens air, which means produce oxygen.
One group of scholars, represented by the writer, think that non-gravitational environment cause severe health problems like decresed muscle mass and low bone density. Again, the speakee spesificall addresses this point when he states that there are some method to prevent suc situation. For example, exercising regularly, and taking additional vitamins prevents from mentioned certain health problems.
Finally, the author wraps his argument by positing that constant exposure to solar radiation is life-threathening to the human. Meanwhile, the lecturer takes issue with this claim by contending that astronauts do not meet solar radiaton all time, but occasionally. They can avoid the situation by placing solar radiation detector, which is affordable and light, on their ship.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...d humankind to Mars. More specifically, in regards to the passage, the writer puts forth the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o Mars. More specifically, in regards to the passage, the writer puts forth the i...
^^
Line 1, column 187, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ea that traveling to Mars is has several problems that makes it almost impossible...
^^
Line 3, column 35, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
.... First and foremost, the author of the the reading states that the distance betwee...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 35, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
.... First and foremost, the author of the the reading states that the distance betwee...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 159, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s time more than 2 years. This condition makes it difficult to carry abundant sup...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, so, then, while, as to, for example, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1568.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 301.0 270.72406181 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20930232558 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80030776903 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 145.348785872 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614617940199 0.540411800872 114% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.51434878587 396% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.3257565972 49.2860985944 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.533333333 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0666666667 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0817344260049 0.272083759551 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0252178624173 0.0996497079465 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0335890641918 0.0662205650399 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0446722209718 0.162205337803 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0280343505262 0.0443174109184 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 63.6247240618 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.