tpo 2

Essay topics: tpo 2

kelly kel's picture

Both the reading and the lecture are about the pros and cons of the group work. The writer believes that teamwork offers several advantages. The lecturer challenges the claims made by the author. He is of the opinion that there are still many issues with the benefits of teamwork.

First, the article posits that working in a team can offer a wide range of knowledge and skills. Additionally, he mentions that it can be quick and given tasks can be highly creative with lesser mistakes. However, the professor refutes the claim by giving the specific example of a company assigning a group of teens with a project, with a devastating result. He claims that in teamwork, various disputes might come up which would result in the delay of work. Few people can influence the other group members with the decision, which other members wouldn't agree with the same.

Secondly, the writer declares that working in a team can be very rewarding. It would provide a chance to shine and take up the risky decision which working as an individual wouldn't consider it due to its risk involved. Whereas, the listening argues that in the group, there are chances that in teamwork, few members would take a free rite without contributing to a project. if the project becomes successful, credits go to all and if the project fails, the active member of the project would fail too therefore, it's unfair for them.

To sum up, both the author and the professor hold a conflicting view of each other.

Essay Categories: 
Votes: 
Average: 0.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by other users:
Post date Users Rates More about the essay
8 hours 2 min ago a0000 73 Read full essay
1 day 4 hours ago bishoy 81 Read full essay
1 day 14 hours ago a0000 68 Read full essay
1 day 19 hours ago a0000 66 Read full essay
3 days 4 hours ago bishoy 73 Read full essay
3 days 9 hours ago Seema Modak 3 Read full essay
3 days 9 hours ago Seema Modak 3 Read full essay
3 days 9 hours ago a0000 3 Read full essay
3 days 11 hours ago a0000 73 Read full essay
4 days 7 hours ago Seema Modak 71 Read full essay

Pages

More essays by this user:

Pages

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 549, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
... with the decision, which other members wouldnt agree with the same. Secondly, the...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 174, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...decision which working as an individual wouldnt consider it due to its risk involved. W...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 365, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ke a free rite without contributing to a project. if the project becomes successf...
^^
Line 9, column 376, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...ite without contributing to a project. if the project becomes successful, credits...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, whereas, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1236.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 257.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8093385214 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48695669344 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560311284047 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 367.2 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.271425594 49.2860985944 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.2857142857 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3571428571 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92857142857 7.06452816374 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.3589403974 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 53.8541721854 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.0289183223 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Pages