TPO-28
The lecture forcibly contradicts what is argued in the reading material. According to the passage, the National Geographic Society substantiated the Peary’s account was consistent and persuasive, and it also declared that he had indeed reached the North Pole. Nonetheless, the professor asserts that closer scrutiny of this argument would display how flimsy it is. He, in turn, present several evidences to demonstrate his statement.
To begin with, the professor casts doubt on the theory by contending that some of his friends who contributed much money to him were working at the Nation Geographic Society. Plus, the committee is not only unobjective but also sheerly biased. Therefore, this point undoubtedly forms a contrast with the author’s.
Furthermore, the author affirms that there was a man called Tom Avery who already conquered the difficulty to reach the North Pole in less than 37 days. Thus, Peary’s claims are not impossible. On the contrary, the professor stands in stark opposition and counteracts the viewpoint by expounding that why Tom Avery can vanquish the challenge in less than 37 days is that Tom Avery did not carry the food by himself. Plus, the weather during that time was quite clement; therefore, Tom Avery can attain the goal in less than 37 days. However, Peary carried his food by himself and the weather during that time was quite extremely adverse. This shows that their conditions are entirely different. Thus, the claim of the author is virtually indefensible and does not hold the water.
Last but not least, the passage may be plausible that photograph can prove that Peary has reached the North Pole successfully. Nevertheless, one critical point is left out of consideration. Pointed out by the professor, the reading passage thoroughly neglects the truth that photos may have become blurred and faded. Consequently, we can not measure the accurate position of the sun by calculating the shadows, and we can not even assure the photograph was snapped at the North Pole.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, therefore, thus, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1711.0 1373.03311258 125% => OK
No of words: 328.0 270.72406181 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21646341463 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86185339652 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 145.348785872 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573170731707 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 419.366225166 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.9111865538 49.2860985944 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0555555556 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2222222222 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.44444444444 7.06452816374 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348920111005 0.272083759551 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0925165035421 0.0996497079465 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0925764504975 0.0662205650399 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183297125723 0.162205337803 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0765888941305 0.0443174109184 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 63.6247240618 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.