TPO-28
The lecture apparently disproves what is argued in the reading material. According to the passage, the National Geographic Society substantiated that Peary's account was consistent and persuasive and they also declared that he had indeed reached the North Pole. However, the professor asserts that a closer scrutiny of this argument will display how flimsy it is. He, in turn, presents several evidence to demonstrate his statement.
To begin with, the lecturer maintains that the reading passage fails to take into account that one of his friends who attributed much money to him was working at the National Geographic Society. Plus, the committee did not examine his record thoroughly; thus, the conclusion made by the committee is not only unobjective but also sheerly biased. Therefore, the claim expressed in the reading is virtually indefensible and does not hold water.
Furthermore, the author affirms that there was a man called Tom Avery who have already conquered the difficulty to reach the North Pole in less than 37 days. Thus, Peary's claims are not impossible. On the contrary, the professor stands in stark opposition and counterattacks this viewpoint by explaining that why Tom Avery can accomplish the challenge in less than 37 days is that Tom Avery did not carry the food by himself. Plus, the weather during that time was quite good; therefore, Tom Avery can finish it in less than 37 days. However, Peary carried his food by himself and the weather during that time was quite extremely bad. This shows that their conditions are entirely different. Thus, the claim of the author is scanty of rationalities.
Last but not least, the passage may be plausible that the photograph can prove that Peary has reached the North Pole successfully. However, one critical point is left out of consideration. Pointed out by the professor, the reading passage thoroughly neglects the truth that the photos may have already become blurred and faded. Hence, we can not measure the accurate position of the Sun by calculating the shadows, and we can not even assure that the photograph was snapped at the North Pole.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 386, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[8]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun evidence seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'some evidence'.
Suggestion: some evidence
...how flimsy it is. He, in turn, presents several evidence to demonstrate his statement. To b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1791.0 1373.03311258 130% => OK
No of words: 349.0 270.72406181 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13180515759 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71805465693 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 145.348785872 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535816618911 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 419.366225166 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2040098739 49.2860985944 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3888888889 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372943605176 0.272083759551 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10401547893 0.0996497079465 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0974850385881 0.0662205650399 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20192734061 0.162205337803 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651119466864 0.0443174109184 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 63.6247240618 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.