TPO 28 Integrated
As opposed to the three arguments suggests that Robert E. Peary has indeed reached the North Pole in the reading, the lecturer contends that these evidences are not solid and unconvincing.
First of all, although the reading states that the National Geographic Society did perform an investigation into Peary's records and equipment and announced that Peary had reached the North Pole, the lecturer claims that the investigation itself was not objective but conducted by some of Peary's close friends. Moreover, the investigation was used only about two days, which is prone to biased result. Hence, the investigation is not trustworthy and cannot be used to prove Peary's claim.
Secondly, the reading passage suggests that a recent expedition by Tom Avery made the same trek in less than that by Peary. However, the lecturer refutes that the conditions of them are totally different. Not only Tom Avery's expedition carried much less weight, especially the food was supplied by air plane instead of carrying by himself, but also the temperature condition is more favorable than Peary's. Consequently, it is not suitable to use Avery's record to support Peary's claim.
Last but not least, the third point of view in the reading suggests that it is possible to measure the Sun's position of photographs to support Peary's claim. However, the lecturer states that the photographs was taken over 100 years and therefore not suitable to prove. In fact, there photographs are most blurred and faded and were taken by an old camera. Therefore, these cannot used to prove the Peary's claim also.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 412, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...e cannot used to prove the Pearys claim also.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1337.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 259.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16216216216 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65796396501 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555984555985 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.6904888404 49.2860985944 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.846153846 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9230769231 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46153846154 7.06452816374 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.403284531063 0.272083759551 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132492578701 0.0996497079465 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104019684709 0.0662205650399 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238683780712 0.162205337803 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.065637910948 0.0443174109184 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.