TPO27
The lecture and the article are both about the little ice age that was a period of unusually cold temperatures in many parts of the world. The article suggests three possible explanations for occurring the little ice age. The lecture challenges the claims made by the article, He is of the belief that these explanations are out of date and scientists explain new information about the causes of little ice age.
To begin with, the article states that before the ice age, the weather was very warm, so melted glaciers sent a large amount of cold freshwater into the gulf stream and this cold water was the cause of little ice age. The specific argument is challenged by the lecture. He is of the opinion the cooling gulf stream had occurred in Europe and North America but the little ice age was severed in the southern hemisphere. Therefore this reason is faulty.
Secondly, the writer mentions that the dark cloud of dust of volcanic eruption blocked sunlight; Therefore, the weather became cooler. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by mentioning that volcanic eruption has very visual signs like dark snow. Moreover, the dark dust was not very large to create the ice age.
Last but not least, the author posits that decreasing in human population was critically important in cooling the climate. In contrast, the lecture position is that there was not enough time and the population raised fastly so they cut the trees and produced co2 gases again.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 223, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...tions for occurring the little ice age. The lecture challenges the claims made by t...
^^^
Line 5, column 420, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...was severed in the southern hemisphere. Therefore this reason is faulty. Secondly, t...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1221.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 248.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92338709677 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44576645312 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540322580645 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 385.2 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9125982688 49.2860985944 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.75 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06452816374 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.462246196757 0.272083759551 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157682931749 0.0996497079465 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111206177627 0.0662205650399 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249534985092 0.162205337803 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107934181195 0.0443174109184 244% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.