TPO44
According to the passege silver coins are a genuine historical evidence that norse came into contact with north american settlements, although the reasons presented in the passege seems reasonable, the lecturer offers some evidences to refute them all. She explains that the norse were in contact with north americans.
First, the author asserts that there was a great distance between the site of norse settlement and the place were silver coins were found. On the other hand, the professor explains that there are historical evidences that prove north americans were intrested in many other objects since they traveled long distances all over north america and brought many objects such as coin with them back to their settlement.
Second, it is stated in the passege that there were no other coin in the site of the norse settlement. By contrast, the lecturer maintains that this reason does not mean necessarily since the norse were not permanent settlement and they might have return to the orupe and in this time they packed up their valuable objects such as coin with them. In this regard, it is possible that they have brought them back with themeselves to the europe.
Finally, the author mentions that coins were not as valuable as money in the north america. On the contrary, the lecturer says that it is true that they were not valuable as money, but the north american liked the coins beauty and it was appealing to them. So, they used them to make necklace and other jweleries. By the time norse found that they were interested in such these things, they trade silver coins with north americans
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 214, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'coins'' or 'coin's'?
Suggestion: coins'; coin's
...money, but the north american liked the coins beauty and it was appealing to them. So...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, second, so, such as, it is true, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 22.412803532 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1341.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 273.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91208791209 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32855273029 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 145.348785872 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.457875457875 0.540411800872 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 414.0 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.0233378432 49.2860985944 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.909090909 110.228320801 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8181818182 21.698381199 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.466877764103 0.272083759551 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.210879808102 0.0996497079465 212% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0870032214707 0.0662205650399 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.316078425867 0.162205337803 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374065271962 0.0443174109184 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.