tpo48
Both author and lecturer offer two opposing views on the methods proposed as a solution for the declining frog population. While the reading part lists three methods to overcome this incident, the professor counters these specific points and presents some clues to call into the question for the information in the passage.
First of all, the article posits that the law of banning the farmers from the usage of harmful pesticides in the cultivation areas next to the frogs' habitats will be effective. However, the instructor challenges this claim due to the fact that this law is not either practical or fair. As she asserts, the majority of farmers rely on these pesticides to prevent the crop lost and to be able to compete in the farming market. If the law has been passed to reduce or prohibit the use of these pesticides the farmers, who lands located next to the frogs’ habitats, will face the severe problems such as the lower crop production or the crop lost.
Next, the text mentions that the treatment such as the antifungal medication to prevent death caused in the frogs by the dehydration. Conversely, the professor underlines the fact that this treatment should apply individually; as a result, it is not cost-effective, and it is complicated. Based on her assertion, this procedure is applicable in a case which the frogs are captured and treated individually. Moreover, since the parent frogs pass on the fungus and its infection to the offspring, this treatment should be applied and repeated in the whole new generations, which is costly and an arduous task.
Finally, the reading part assumes that the great protection of the frogs’ habitats such as the lacks and wetlands can provide the better condition for the frogs to recover. On the contrast, the professor casts doubts on the accuracy of this claim by pointing to the mean threaten on the frogs’ living place. As she states, although the protection of the wetlands is beneficial, it is not the premier reason of the lack's disappearance. The mean threatens of the lake and wetlands is the global warming. Besides, as long as this threaten does not address accurately, the whole protection will be abortive.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 425, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lacks'' or 'lack's'?
Suggestion: lacks'; lack's
...al, it is not the premier reason of the lacks disappearance. The mean threatens of th...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'conversely', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'while', 'such as', 'as a result', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.25181598063 0.261695866417 96% => OK
Verbs: 0.138014527845 0.158904122519 87% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0726392251816 0.0723426182421 100% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0363196125908 0.0435111971325 83% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0169491525424 0.0277247811725 61% => OK
Prepositions: 0.116222760291 0.128828473217 90% => OK
Participles: 0.0411622276029 0.0370669169778 111% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.81424016739 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0314769975787 0.0208969081088 151% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.176755447942 0.128158765124 138% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0145278450363 0.0158828679856 91% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00726392251816 0.0114777025283 63% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2206.0 1645.83664459 134% => OK
No of words: 368.0 271.125827815 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.99456521739 6.08160592843 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.04852973271 108% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.339673913043 0.374372842146 91% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.288043478261 0.287516216867 100% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.222826086957 0.187439937562 119% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.133152173913 0.113142543107 118% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81424016739 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 145.348785872 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513586956522 0.539623497131 95% => OK
Word variations: 55.285592235 53.8517498576 103% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0529801325 115% => OK
Sentence length: 24.5333333333 21.7502111507 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2098154435 49.3711431718 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.066666667 132.220823453 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5333333333 21.7502111507 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.8 0.878197800319 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 53.3376811594 50.5018328374 106% => OK
Elegance: 2.13924050633 1.90840788429 112% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.470187075589 0.549887131256 86% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.18601309593 0.142949733639 130% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0800081193638 0.0787303798458 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.702360276761 0.631733273073 111% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.122853675752 0.139662658121 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.250032226081 0.266732575781 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0841773117816 0.103435571967 81% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.555357255884 0.414875509568 134% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0500658833918 0.0530846634433 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.362464335169 0.40443939384 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351305689031 0.0528353158467 66% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.26048565121 70% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.49668874172 143% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.1766004415 63% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.2958057395 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.