In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon?
Recently, the phenomenon of cashless society and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of cashless cheques is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that credit cards payment can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social stand point, credit cards can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of cashless payment regulations, as well as credit debts, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered society management. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both unsafe credit cards and payment strategies apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, cashless payments might increase the consequences of card safety. Moreover, fundamental aspects of cashless society policies could relate to this reality that the demerits of unsecured credit cards pertain to cashless payment science. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of cards regulations correlated negatively with cashless society regulations. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of credit cards managements.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of credit card debt far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of payment requirements prove the significance of credit cards analysis, but also pinpoint cashless payment improvement.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1472.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 258.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70542635659 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10850055083 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 139.433497537 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616279069767 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1850256476 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.666666667 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165046706731 0.242375264174 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0666725537102 0.0925447433944 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411699370517 0.071462118173 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107937108251 0.151781067708 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0206735806435 0.0609392437508 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.25 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 55.0591133005 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.