In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon?
Beyond doubt, the world has witnessed a massive growth of digital transformation these days. One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is a significant change in using the cards among people in our cashless societies. As such, there are both merits and demerits of this trend, although I am of the opinion that the advantages of using credit cards are countless as described below.
There is a deluge of arguments in favour of my stance, but the most preponderant one is that due to this digital transformation in using cards, it benefits the people by using cards anywhere without any hassle which is impossible when it comes to cash scenarios. Not only there is an improvement in using cards, but also there is a significant advancement in the lifestyle of people, with the introduction of hi-tech apps like phone banking, wallet money and so on. For example, people, who cross the toll-gate, no need pay using cash as cards facilities are enabled in most of the places. Needless to say, all these benefits stand this change in good stead when development of credit cards is concerned.
There are, however, some pitfalls that can easily overwhelm the potential benefits of something. Primarily, the people in the modern era are coming the closer to the technological advancement, especially cards usage, but from other perspective, they are losing their privacy and making their life more complicated. To quote an instance, when cashless society is implemented, hackers also start hacking the data during online transactions. Hence, it is apparent why many are against this cashless communication development.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that despite some drawbacks, the benefits of using cards in our cashless society are indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... are countless as described below. There is a deluge of arguments in favour...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ment of credit cards is concerned. There are, however, some pitfalls that c...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ashless communication development. In view of the arguments outlined above,...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 31.9359605911 141% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 294.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23129251701 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89411613216 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1731970911 50.4703680194 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.166666667 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.9669160288 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 7.25397266985 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233747892933 0.242375264174 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0760705618173 0.0925447433944 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052641494416 0.071462118173 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128260059541 0.151781067708 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0426658544529 0.0609392437508 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.