Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
"critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field." though there are some veritable sentiments raised by this statement, I find myself disagreeing with the absolute quality of the statement. there are both benefits that can be derived from critical judgment from experts of a given field as well as criticisms from sources external to the field.
experts in a field have the advantage of a greater understanding of their area of expertise due to their education and experience. through the benefit of their specialized training, they have an understanding of the mechanics and workings behind their given field that the average layman does not have. this is especially true in the technical fields. An engineer building a dam would have a better understanding of the types of materials that would be suitable for specific environments. A doctor would be able to provide a better diagnosis than the untrained person. Therefore there is no denying that critical judgment from an expert in a given field does hold a lot of weight.
However, critical judgment from others who are not experts in the given field should not be discredited entirely. though not necessarily from an expert, criticisms from sources external to the field can provide insightful views. after all, progress is best made in an environment that generates critical judgment, as it opens the floor for debate and provides perspectives from different viewpoints. experts, though having greater understanding in their field of expertise, could potentially be limited by established facts and learning from their education or research. For example, it has been often said that politicians are often stuck in their “ivory towers” for they are not experiencing what the common man is going through. though they are supposedly experts in managing political situations, it would be helpful to gain insight from citizens and how political policies affect their lives.
also, judgment from external critics can help level out the subjectivity of any study in a given field. after all, we are only humans,and many of our motives are driven by selfish reasons. experts who work in a given field are also driven by their own biased views and opinions. they could be driven by any number of motivations; for fame, for financial gains, to incite reactions from others and so on. For example, an artist's work, though an expression from the individual artist itself, could benefit from criticism and opinions from non-artist sources. opinions from from outside sources could provide insights that has never been thought of by the artist himself, as well as provide constructive criticisms on how to improve his future works.
In conclusion, there are both benefits to be derived from critical judgment from both experts and non-experts of any given field. experts, with their experience and training are able to provide solid critical judgment based on their understanding of the mechanics of the given field. However, critical judgment from external sources also provide perspectives from different views as well as neutralize the biased views that is sometimes generated by experts themselves.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 275, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
... the absolute quality of the statement. there are both benefits that can be derived f...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 372, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... judgment from experts of a given field as well as criticisms from sources external to the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Experts
... from sources external to the field. experts in a field have the advantage of a grea...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 132, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Through
... due to their education and experience. through the benefit of their specialized traini...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 304, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
... that the average layman does not have. this is especially true in the technical fie...
^^^^
Line 3, column 570, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...er diagnosis than the untrained person. Therefore there is no denying that critical judgm...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 115, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Though
...eld should not be discredited entirely. though not necessarily from an expert, critici...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 230, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: After
...the field can provide insightful views. after all, progress is best made in an enviro...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 401, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Experts
...perspectives from different viewpoints. experts, though having greater understanding in...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 588, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[8]
Message: The adverb 'often' is usually put between 'has' and 'been'.
Suggestion: has often been
... education or research. For example, it has been often said that politicians are often stuck i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 743, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Though
...g what the common man is going through. though they are supposedly experts in managing...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
...litical policies affect their lives. also, judgment from external critics can hel...
^^^^
Line 7, column 105, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: After
...ectivity of any study in a given field. after all, we are only humans,and many of our...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 134, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , and
...ven field. after all, we are only humans,and many of our motives are driven by selfi...
^^^^
Line 7, column 190, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Experts
... motives are driven by selfish reasons. experts who work in a given field are also driv...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 280, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...by their own biased views and opinions. they could be driven by any number of motiva...
^^^^
Line 7, column 558, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Opinions
...m and opinions from non-artist sources. opinions from from outside sources could provide...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 567, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: from
...nions from non-artist sources. opinions from from outside sources could provide insights ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 131, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Experts
...rts and non-experts of any given field. experts, with their experience and training are...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, therefore, well, after all, for example, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 82.0 58.6224719101 140% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2733.0 2235.4752809 122% => OK
No of words: 519.0 442.535393258 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26589595376 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7730044521 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84246689674 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.443159922929 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 830.7 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.10617977528 290% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1739949234 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.826086957 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5652173913 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.86956521739 5.21951772744 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 19.0 7.80617977528 243% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.514869748818 0.243740707755 211% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170870972985 0.0831039109588 206% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1451641005 0.0758088955206 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.353607726312 0.150359130593 235% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.148022568855 0.0667264976115 222% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 100.480337079 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.