Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
People might be buried in deep thought when they initially see the statement that whether the ability to sustain friendships with a small group of people over a long period of time is much more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily. Some would argue as it is the commonly accepted truth that it is absolutely that the ability to sustain friendships with a small group of people over a long period of time is much more important for happiness. Others, however, hold the opposite view that the ability to make many new friends easily is more important. There are more merits than demerits to choose the latter point. I will take a closer look at the statement and give my reasons.
The first and foremost point is that making friends easily can expand one’s social circle increasingly. With a lot of friends, it is more likely for you to be successful. For example, one of my college classmates, Lucy, has created her own company with her friends. She has made a considerable amount of friends all over the world from the Internet. Leveraging the friend resources, she has been a millionaire since the company established. Since then, she has a happier and wealthier life. Therefore, friends can bring you a lot of benefits as well as happiness.
Another point worth mentioning is that it is demanding for one is able to make friends easily. In order to make a lot of new friends, you have to be outgoing and friendly. As we all know that with these two characteristics, it would be less difficult to overcome obstacles. We do not feel happy because we have many problems in our lives, such as bad relationships with our girlfriends or boyfriends, poor financial conditions. Thus, if you can have so many friends, you can ask for help and get numerous ideas from them. As an old saying goes, there are three walking on the road, I am sure that I can learn something among them. With this quality, one is capable of solving many problems and obtain happiness in the end.
Further lending credence to my position that the more friends you have, the more happiness you have. Different people have different hobbies and interests. As a result, it is fascinating to have a variety of friends. Without any doubt, you will get a lot of fun when you are with these friends. For instance, one of your friends is an artist, then you will develop your ability to appreciating beauty.
All in all, I have no choice but to reiterate my point that I think is more important to make many new friends
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ith a small group of people over a long period of time is much more important for happiness th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 426, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ith a small group of people over a long period of time is much more important for happiness. O...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...ems and obtain happiness in the end. Further lending credence to my position that th...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 111, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... more important to make many new friends
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, i think, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2086.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 448.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65625 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63698275558 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479910714286 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 644.4 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.1519077027 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.44 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.92 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 22.0 11.8709677419 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.411951707066 0.236089414692 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103796408302 0.076458572812 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106897570214 0.0737576698707 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224479153671 0.150856017488 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.138253742431 0.0645574589148 214% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.45 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.002688172 190% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.