5. The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Balmer Island Gazette."On Balmer Island, where mopeds serve as a popular form of transportation, the population increases to 100,000 during the summer months. To reduce the number of accidents inv

Essay topics:

5. The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Balmer Island Gazette.
"On Balmer Island, where mopeds serve as a popular form of transportation, the population increases to 100,000 during the summer months. To reduce the number of accidents involving mopeds and pedestrians, the town council of Balmer Island should limit the number of mopeds rented by the island's moped rental companies from 50 per day to 25 per day during the summer season. By limiting the number of rentals, the town council will attain the 50 percent annual reduction in moped accidents that was achieved last year on the neighboring island of Seaville, when Seaville's town council enforced similar limits on moped rentals."
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.

In the argument, the author has cited some facts and came to the conclusion that by limiting the number of rentals, the town council will attain the 50 percent annual reduction in moped accidents. However the argument is rife with holes and unwarrant assumptions, and hence, not strong enough to buttress the preceded claim.

First of all, there is an assumption that the decrease of accidents in S is due to the limiting policy. However the author should address the question that whether there is a causation between these two events. Just because both occur at the same time does not necessarily means one leads to another.There can be some of other reasons for the decrease in S. It can be due to the improved road condition or some new setting traffic signs, even the more strict traffic laws. Without ruling out these or other possibility the argument is uncredible, thereby the prediction may not be achieved.

Even if the author successfuly sabstantiated the assumption that it was the limiting policy that cause the decrease of accidents in S, there still leaves a question open to doudt that does the condition in S and B is exactly resembling including the demographic structure, geographic condition,and the traffic envirenment, and so on. Since there is no evidence to indicate that. It is entirely possible that the population in S is far less than that of A, or the road in S is more flat and broad.
Finnally, even if the author can substantiate all of the forgoing assumptions, in asserting that by limiting the number of rentals, A could attain 50% decrease just like which S has achieved, the autor overlooks the possiblility that the specific number of accidents in S is very small, accordingly the 50% decrease of accidents is small too, albite 50% is a big number, but the number of accidents is extremely high.

To recapitulate, it is clear that there are still some unexplored avenues in the argument due to which the conclusion seems untenable. It would be wise to address those areas prior to setting any firm conclusion on the matter.

Votes
Average: 6.2 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 198, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...nt annual reduction in moped accidents. However the argument is rife with holes and unw...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 105, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...nts in S is due to the limiting policy. However the author should address the question ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 274, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'mean'
Suggestion: mean
...r at the same time does not necessarily means one leads to another.There can be some ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 301, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: There
... necessarily means one leads to another.There can be some of other reasons for the de...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 294, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , and
...ographic structure, geographic condition,and the traffic envirenment, and so on. Sin...
^^^^
Line 5, column 335, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...and the traffic envirenment, and so on. Since there is no evidence to indicate that. ...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 47, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ly, even if the author can substantiate all of the forgoing assumptions, in asserting that...
^^^^^^^^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['accordingly', 'but', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'so', 'still', 'first of all']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.225641025641 0.25644967241 88% => OK
Verbs: 0.146153846154 0.15541462614 94% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0846153846154 0.0836205057962 101% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0717948717949 0.0520304965353 138% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0128205128205 0.0272364105082 47% => OK
Prepositions: 0.117948717949 0.125424944231 94% => OK
Participles: 0.0307692307692 0.0416121511921 74% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.82427677621 2.79052419416 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0282051282051 0.026700313972 106% => OK
Particles: 0.0025641025641 0.001811407834 142% => OK
Determiners: 0.141025641026 0.113004496875 125% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0205128205128 0.0255425247493 80% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0102564102564 0.0127820249294 80% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2069.0 2731.13054187 76% => OK
No of words: 354.0 446.07635468 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.84463276836 6.12365571057 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.57801047555 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.333333333333 0.378187486979 88% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.265536723164 0.287650121315 92% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.200564971751 0.208842608468 96% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.129943502825 0.135150697306 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82427677621 2.79052419416 101% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 207.018472906 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511299435028 0.469332199767 109% => OK
Word variations: 54.2363090047 52.1807786196 104% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 20.039408867 60% => OK
Sentence length: 29.5 23.2022227129 127% => OK
Sentence length SD: 106.456955307 57.7814097925 184% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 172.416666667 141.986410481 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5 23.2022227129 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.916666666667 0.724660767414 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 3.58251231527 195% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 56.0536723164 51.9672348444 108% => OK
Elegance: 1.62222222222 1.8405768891 88% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.492668529679 0.441005458295 112% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.137556663794 0.135418324435 102% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0460419791702 0.0829849096947 55% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.698853428996 0.58762219726 119% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.173835569393 0.147661913831 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.261668914393 0.193483328276 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108657313721 0.0970749176394 112% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.424814080929 0.42659136922 100% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.140282045798 0.0774707102158 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.372750502498 0.312017818177 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479779943506 0.0698173142475 69% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.33743842365 36% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.87684729064 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.82512315271 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 6.46551724138 46% => OK
Negative topic words: 7.0 5.36822660099 130% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.82389162562 71% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 14.657635468 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.