The autonomy of any country is based on the strength of it’s borders; if the number of illegal immigrants entering a country cannot be checked, both it’s economy and national identity are endangered. Because illegal immigrants pose such threats, every efforts must be made to return them to their country of origin.
The editor has assumed several ungrounded assumptions in stating that illegal immigrants cause problems in the nation and the identity of a nation as a whole is endangered. There are no proper proofs that can validate the editor's points. The claims are based on incomplete research and hence the validity of the argument is dubious.
Firstly, the editor has assumed that the autonomy of the country is based on the strength of it's borders which is flawed. In this era of technology, there are several ways of border encroachment and hence autonomy of a country cannot be singlehandedly assigned to the strength of border. The editor has failed to take this fact into concern. So, the editor's point can be undermined.
Secondly, the editor has claimed that illegal immigrants pose a threat to economy as well as national identity which is entirely plausible but not necessarily correct. There have been several cases where immigrants have been helpful for the betterment of the country and to raise the economy. Also, a nations's identity is demonstrated by leadership and devotion of the citizens. There are no strong evidence to butress the fact immigrants cause threat to a nation's soveriegnty.
Furthermore, the editor has not considered the cost of returnig immigrants to their home countries. A detail research needs to be conducted about the resource requirements and cost associated with the process. On the other hand, the editor has not provided any documented proof for any of the stated problems. If the editor had presented a documented proof where illegal immigration has caused a conondrum, the editor's claims would had been irrefutable.
In conclusion, there are several fallacies in the editor's claim about the immigrants. An extensive research is required to provide necessary data that would validate the editor's claim. Thus, the editor's view on illegal immigrants is fallible and cannot be assumed a precise depiction of the possible case.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 317 350
No. of Characters: 1618 1500
No. of Different Words: 153 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.22 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.104 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.785 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 129 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 103 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 75 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 39 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.611 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.765 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.611 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.362 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.362 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.094 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 455, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a nation' or simply 'nations'?
Suggestion: a nation; nations
...ess the fact immigrants cause threat to a nations soveriegnty. Furthermore, the editor h...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 432, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...d a conondrum, the editors claims would had been irrefutable. In conclusion, there...
^^^
Line 5, column 86, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'extensive research'.
Suggestion: Extensive research
...the editors claim about the immigrants. An extensive research is required to provide necessary data t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.6327345309 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 28.8173652695 31% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 55.5748502994 65% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 16.3942115768 43% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1647.0 2260.96107784 73% => OK
No of words: 317.0 441.139720559 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19558359621 5.12650576532 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.56307096286 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85256541328 2.78398813304 102% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 204.123752495 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482649842271 0.468620217663 103% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 705.55239521 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.96107784431 0% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.76447105788 148% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 19.7664670659 91% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.8473053892 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.3764609821 57.8364921388 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5 119.503703932 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6111111111 23.324526521 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 5.70786347227 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238139130382 0.218282227539 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748694653834 0.0743258471296 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672442379345 0.0701772020484 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139260234562 0.128457276422 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430698878232 0.0628817314937 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.3799401198 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.3550499002 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.5979740519 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.32208582834 104% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 98.500998004 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 12.3882235529 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.1389221557 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.