The council of Maple County, concerned about the counties becomes overdeveloped, is debating a proposed measure that would prevent the development of existing farmland in the county. But the council is also concerned that such a restriction, by limiting t

Essay topics:

The council of Maple County, concerned about the counties becomes overdeveloped, is debating a proposed measure that would prevent the development of existing farmland in the county. But the council is also concerned that such a restriction, by limiting the supply of new housing, could lead to significant increases in the price of housing in the county. Proponents of the measure note that Chestnut County established a similar measure ten years ago and its housing prices have increased only modestly since. However, opponents of the measure note that Pine County adopted restrictions on the development of new residential housing fifteen years ago, and its housing prices have since more than doubled. The council currently predicts that the proposed measure, if passed, will result in a significant increase in housing prices in Maple County.

Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the prediction and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the prediction.

In the given argument the council of Maple County is concerned about over development and fearful to restrict the development of farmland because it may raise the pricing of housing. The council also presents annals which show modestly increase in price since the opponent describes that it may double the pricing. There are two important points to be discussed first, the over development should be control. Secondly, the pricing of housing should not be increase. I am agree with the council of Maple County to restrict the development over farmland but the price of housing cannot be clearly assume without solid reasons.

Moreover, the farmland is most important for any country because to fulfill the food’s demand of the country. There are so many people’s earning depends on the farm and they will be unemployed if the over development of the county do not control by the council. On the broader sense if every county ignore the country’s development and enlarge their development than economy of the country will be disturbed. Country like India’s economy depends on the farming and to compromise with farmland would be dangerous for country.

Additionally, where the matter is to increase in price of housing not only depends on the restriction of land. Thanks to technology we can build multistory buildings to fulfill need of shelter for people who are less costly than the houses of county. The proposal to restrict the farmland gets passed with arrangement of other shelter than the price may increase slightly.

However, it is correct that if supply of the goods or services is limited than the price increased significantly. But in this case the price cannot be raised after a limit because there are other options for public. In the given argument the author ignores the market conditions and without it no one can jumped to the conclusion that the price will be increase. One more thing that the annals of Chestnut County and Pine County presented to strengthen the point but the record was very old and not significant. Because the economics conditions never be constant for such a long time.

Finally, the council had taken good decision to restrict farming land but the council has to analyse the price of housing before and should find some solid reasons.

Votes
Average: 4.6 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 401, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'controlled'?
Suggestion: controlled
...d first, the over development should be control. Secondly, the pricing of housing shoul...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 472, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...of housing should not be increase. I am agree with the council of Maple County to res...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 306, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'jump'
Suggestion: jump
...et conditions and without it no one can jumped to the conclusion that the price will b...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, as to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.6327345309 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.9520958084 116% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 11.1786427146 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 13.6137724551 51% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 28.8173652695 45% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 55.5748502994 97% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 16.3942115768 67% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1932.0 2260.96107784 85% => OK
No of words: 381.0 441.139720559 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07086614173 5.12650576532 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.56307096286 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6821424581 2.78398813304 96% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 204.123752495 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482939632546 0.468620217663 103% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 705.55239521 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 19.7664670659 91% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.8473053892 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9411592514 57.8364921388 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.333333333 119.503703932 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 23.324526521 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.70786347227 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192711447728 0.218282227539 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060932042577 0.0743258471296 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637842860944 0.0701772020484 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0997335048926 0.128457276422 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554653853474 0.0628817314937 88% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.3799401198 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.3550499002 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.197005988 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.5979740519 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.32208582834 98% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 98.500998004 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.1389221557 93% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 381 350
No. of Characters: 1868 1500
No. of Different Words: 185 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.418 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.903 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.506 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 147 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 113 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 60 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 32 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.167 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.64 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.722 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.335 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.576 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.094 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5