The following argument was made in a newspaper editorial:
“The autonomy of any country is based on the strength of its borders; if the number of illegal immigrants entering a country cannot be checked, both its economy and national identity are endangered. Because illegal immigrants pose such threats, every effort must be made to return them to their country of origin.”
While it is important that the number of illegal immigrants should be checked, there isn't enough evidence that is provided in the assertion which states that the autonomy of a country is based on the strength of its borders. For example, the autonomy of a country can also depend on the government on the country and the way in which the country is ruled. It can also depend on whether the country is a communist country or whether it is a democracy and there are prerogative rights of every person. It can depend on how free the citizens of the country feel.
There isn't enough evidence cited in the argument that corroborates the assertion mentioned that the economy of the country would be endangered if the number of illegal immigrants isn't checked. There can be various other reasons such as a phase of recession in the country or the fall of the government which could affect the economy of the country to a great extent. Thus to solely base affected economy on the number of illegal immigrants does not seem plausible.
The writer asserts that the national identity of a country is endangered by the number of illegal immigrants entering the country. While this does seem to make sense, because the illegal immigrants can definitely pose a treat to the security of the country, the writer has not given enough evidence to prove his assertion. For example, the national identity of a country could also be endangered because of the incompetent ruling of the government.
What would rather be of prime importance rather the economy or the national identity would be the security of the nation which would be at a danger and the foremost step that should be taken must be done by keeping in mind the security of the nation and that of its citizens. While illegal immigrants pose a threat, it does not seem wise to return them to their country of origin. There might be cases where the illegal immigrants are a part of some terrorist group or some other activists of sort. It only seems legit to make sure that there is a thorough interrogation that is done by the government officials and made sure that the immigrants do not pose a threat, based on the investigation and interrogation, further action should be taken.
Therefore, while illegal immigrants do pose a threat to a country, the assertion made by the writer does not corroborate for the fact that is mentioned in the assertion. There are no examples that are cited by the writer, that support his claim.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 86, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...gal immigrants should be checked, there isnt enough evidence that is provided in the...
^^^^
Line 3, column 7, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
... citizens of the country feel. There isnt enough evidence cited in the argument t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 180, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...red if the number of illegal immigrants isnt checked. There can be various other rea...
^^^^
Line 3, column 368, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...onomy of the country to a great extent. Thus to solely base affected economy on the ...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'if', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'while', 'for example', 'such as', 'to a great extent']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.22440087146 0.25644967241 88% => OK
Verbs: 0.16339869281 0.15541462614 105% => OK
Adjectives: 0.078431372549 0.0836205057962 94% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0326797385621 0.0520304965353 63% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0261437908497 0.0272364105082 96% => OK
Prepositions: 0.141612200436 0.125424944231 113% => OK
Participles: 0.0392156862745 0.0416121511921 94% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.63841369991 2.79052419416 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0196078431373 0.026700313972 73% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.154684095861 0.113004496875 137% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0348583877996 0.0255425247493 136% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0283224400871 0.0127820249294 222% => Maybe 'Which' is overused. If other WH_determiners like 'Who, What, Whom, Whose...' are used too in sentences, then there are no issues.
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2481.0 2731.13054187 91% => OK
No of words: 432.0 446.07635468 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74305555556 6.12365571057 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.57801047555 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.340277777778 0.378187486979 90% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.263888888889 0.287650121315 92% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.168981481481 0.208842608468 81% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0972222222222 0.135150697306 72% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63841369991 2.79052419416 95% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 207.018472906 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.368055555556 0.469332199767 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 39.8005607122 52.1807786196 76% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 20.039408867 80% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.2022227129 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.779115126 57.7814097925 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.0625 141.986410481 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 23.2022227129 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5625 0.724660767414 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.58251231527 112% => OK
Readability: 53.3888888889 51.9672348444 103% => OK
Elegance: 1.82352941176 1.8405768891 99% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.637252614288 0.441005458295 144% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.204713558604 0.135418324435 151% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.104212054111 0.0829849096947 126% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.69346328217 0.58762219726 118% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.147471001261 0.147661913831 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.33318415031 0.193483328276 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135373506386 0.0970749176394 139% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.574715457651 0.42659136922 135% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.101894612873 0.0774707102158 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.470993247215 0.312017818177 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103756832581 0.0698173142475 149% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.33743842365 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.87684729064 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.82512315271 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 6.46551724138 77% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 5.36822660099 93% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.82389162562 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 10.0 14.657635468 68% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.