Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permit inoculations against cow flu to be routinely administered.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
The author of this argument claims that many lives could be saved by administering inoculations routinely to the areas that are affected by this disease. However in the next sentence, in a quite contradictory shaper turn, the author claims at that there is small possibility that a person would die due to inoculations, and hence should not permit such administering. Nevertheless the underlying assumption of the author might be that there could be other safer ways in mitigating the cow flu, rather than the stated administering, which have a superficial logical basis. besides this superficial logical basis and its implicitly contradictory nature, it is rife with holes and ambiguities. The author have failed to provide key evidences to support his/her argument, allowing it to be vulnerable to even the trivial of critisisms. Through critically analyising this argument, one could discover the evidences that are needed to verify or repudiate the argument.
The author in the begining of the argument claims "many lives" would be safe. A more quantitative clarifiaction would have been more enlightening. Without such quantification a clear picture of the positive effects of the routine administering of the inoculations cannot be painted. Thus, as it stands, it tries to give more of an optimistic hopeful edge to the administering of the inoculations. if this quantitative value is substantially higher compared to the shortcommings, this type of administering would deem desirable, weakening the authors argument. On the other hand if this value turns out to be substantially low, despite the qualitative measure "many", the ultimate conclusion of the argument would be streangthend, despite the fallacity.
In the next sentence, the author claim there is a "small possibility" possibility of this administering resualting in a person dying. The author fails to provide evidence as to how ths possibility is determined. Furthermore, he/she fails to quantify this possibility, which would be more telling of the consequences. such provision of evidence and compatible quantification of "small" would strengethen the argument, while failing to provide evidences or finding evidences proving otherwise would severly undermine the argument.
In combating the cow flu, if there is exist no other availble, viable method other than routinely administering inoculations, the authorities might not have a better choice for savinf lives. The compromise would result in saving more life than losing. In such a situation, not routinely administering the inoculations would result in not only loss of li
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Sentence: The author have failed to provide key evidences to support his/her argument, allowing it to be vulnerable to even the trivial of critisisms.
Error: critisisms Suggestion: criticisms
Sentence: Through critically analyising this argument, one could discover the evidences that are needed to verify or repudiate the argument.
Error: analyising Suggestion: analyzing
Sentence: The author in the begining of the argument claims 'many lives' would be safe.
Error: begining Suggestion: beginning
Sentence: A more quantitative clarifiaction would have been more enlightening.
Error: clarifiaction Suggestion: clarification
Sentence: Thus, as it stands, it tries to give more of an optimistic hopeful edge to the administering of the inoculations. if this quantitative value is substantially higher compared to the shortcommings, this type of administering would deem desirable, weakening the authors argument.
Error: shortcommings Suggestion: shortcomings
Sentence: On the other hand if this value turns out to be substantially low, despite the qualitative measure 'many', the ultimate conclusion of the argument would be streangthend, despite the fallacity.
Error: fallacity Suggestion: No alternate word
Error: streangthend Suggestion: strengthen
Sentence: In the next sentence, the author claim there is a 'small possibility' possibility of this administering resualting in a person dying.
Error: resualting Suggestion: resulting
Sentence: Furthermore, he/she fails to quantify this possibility, which would be more telling of the consequences. such provision of evidence and compatible quantification of 'small' would strengethen the argument, while failing to provide evidences or finding evidences proving otherwise would severly undermine the argument.
Error: strengethen Suggestion: strengthen
Error: severly Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: In combating the cow flu, if there is exist no other availble, viable method other than routinely administering inoculations, the authorities might not have a better choice for savinf lives.
Error: savinf Suggestion: saving
Error: availble Suggestion: available
Sentence: In such a situation, not routinely administering the inoculations would result in not only loss of li
Error: li Suggestion: No alternate word
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 402 350
No. of Characters: 2148 1500
No. of Different Words: 188 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.478 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.343 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.218 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 152 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 119 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 93 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 71 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 25.125 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.895 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.438 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.363 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.558 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.129 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...reas that are affected by this disease. However in the next sentence, in a quite contra...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 369, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
...e should not permit such administering. Nevertheless the underlying assumption of the author...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 574, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Besides
...hich have a superficial logical basis. besides this superficial logical basis and its ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 408, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...the administering of the inoculations. if this quantitative value is substantiall...
^^
Line 2, column 553, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ing would deem desirable, weakening the authors argument. On the other hand if this val...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 49, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ext sentence, the author claim there is a 'small possibility' possibili...
^
Line 3, column 327, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Such
...ld be more telling of the consequences. such provision of evidence and compatible qu...
^^^^
Line 4, column 39, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'existed'.
Suggestion: existed
... In combating the cow flu, if there is exist no other availble, viable method other ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, then, thus, while, as to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.6327345309 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.9520958084 131% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 13.6137724551 59% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 28.8173652695 83% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 55.5748502994 94% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 16.3942115768 110% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2245.0 2260.96107784 99% => OK
No of words: 400.0 441.139720559 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6125 5.12650576532 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.56307096286 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.4800134698 2.78398813304 125% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 204.123752495 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495 0.468620217663 106% => OK
syllable_count: 725.4 705.55239521 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59920159681 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.76447105788 114% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.22255489022 237% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 19.7664670659 96% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.8473053892 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8271869231 57.8364921388 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.157894737 119.503703932 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0526315789 23.324526521 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42105263158 5.70786347227 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 5.25449101796 152% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 6.88822355289 160% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191398241715 0.218282227539 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688383334646 0.0743258471296 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584504781673 0.0701772020484 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130445776318 0.128457276422 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488257317543 0.0628817314937 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 14.3799401198 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 48.3550499002 69% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.1628742515 181% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.197005988 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.5979740519 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.32208582834 107% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 98.500998004 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 12.3882235529 129% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.1389221557 93% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.9071856287 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.