A pet food company recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints that pets that had consumed the food experienced vomiting, lethargy, and other signs of illness. After the recall, the pet food company tested samples from the recalled food and determined that all chemicals found in the food were chemicals that are approved for use in pet food. Thus, the recalled food was not responsible for these symptoms, and the company should not devote further resources to the investigation.
As stated that the pet food company which recalled its behemoth amount of pet food on basis of having deleterious effects on the pets ,for which it is concluded that the ingredients were classified as approved and the claims of the disastrous after-effect were false and not being the substantial cause .
The assumptions made are rife with holes ,as the argument does not perspicuously test other variants which could be as one of the causes of the experienced symptoms on consumption of the pet food.Like the packaging dates,processing environments ,packaging material ,are not shown by any graphical data.
secondly it is not feasible to comply without any lucid proof that the company had these incidences in the past or it is the first time.
The presented food material is valid for all breeds of dogs is not mention may be that could have been leading cause behind the health issues related with the consumption.
In nutshell,there are myriad questions before concluding to not investigate and through more draconian considerations the true cause can be found.
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ??? out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 4 2
No. of Sentences: 4 15
No. of Words: 178 350
No. of Characters: 876 1500
No. of Different Words: 112 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.653 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.921 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.795 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 55 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 43 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 35 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 24 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 44.5 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 20.549 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.521 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.521 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.081 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 74, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ny which recalled its behemoth amount of pet food on basis of having deleterious ...
^^
Line 1, column 135, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...f having deleterious effects on the pets ,for which it is concluded that the ing...
^^
Line 1, column 152, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ous effects on the pets ,for which it is concluded that the ingredients were cla...
^^
Line 1, column 172, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ets ,for which it is concluded that the ingredients were classified as approved ...
^^
Line 1, column 306, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...alse and not being the substantial cause . The assumptions made are rife with hol...
^^
Line 2, column 41, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...The assumptions made are rife with holes ,as the argument does not perspicuously t...
^^
Line 2, column 196, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Like
...symptoms on consumption of the pet food.Like the packaging dates,processing environm...
^^^^
Line 2, column 220, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , processing
...of the pet food.Like the packaging dates,processing environments ,packaging material ,are n...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 244, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... packaging dates,processing environments ,packaging material ,are not shown by any...
^^
Line 2, column 264, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...cessing environments ,packaging material ,are not shown by any graphical data. se...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
... ,are not shown by any graphical data. secondly it is not feasible to comply without an...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ad these incidences in the past or it is the first time. The presented food mate...
^^
Line 5, column 12, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , there
...lated with the consumption. In nutshell,there are myriad questions before concluding ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, second, secondly
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.6327345309 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.9520958084 31% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 11.1786427146 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 13.6137724551 51% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 28.8173652695 31% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 55.5748502994 43% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 16.3942115768 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 898.0 2260.96107784 40% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 175.0 441.139720559 40% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13142857143 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 4.56307096286 80% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01477079978 2.78398813304 108% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 204.123752495 55% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.645714285714 0.468620217663 138% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 705.55239521 38% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.96107784431 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 19.7664670659 25% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.8473053892 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.8751606259 57.8364921388 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 179.6 119.503703932 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.0 23.324526521 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.70786347227 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 5.25449101796 247% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.20758483034 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285302762889 0.218282227539 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123679537587 0.0743258471296 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121492776854 0.0701772020484 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123679537587 0.128457276422 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121492776854 0.0628817314937 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.2 14.3799401198 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.41 48.3550499002 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.197005988 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.07 12.5979740519 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.32208582834 118% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 98.500998004 50% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 28.5 12.3882235529 230% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 16.0 11.1389221557 144% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.9071856287 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.