In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
The issue of whether the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions is contentious one. While each side has its strengths and weaknesses, I agree with the statement for numerous reasons. Primarily, beginners are eager to learn new topics, and they can be directed in any way. In addition, they can be used to complete any task as they are not specialized in any area.
First of all, making important contributions in any field requires hard work and time which can be found in inexperienced people. Moreover, they can easily be shaped for new trends of world such as digital transformation, big data, machine learning etc. In contrast, most of the experts are specialized in an area, and it is almost impossible to make them adapt new topics. Ernst & Young, for example, an advisory company, hires only new graduates for its business, because it has long working hours and an orientation training simultaneously. Consequently, the firm increased its worth by $2 billion in five years by using this method.
Furthermore, beginners are able to do various tasks, despite lower salaries. On the other hand, even if the company pays lots of money, experts do not touch any work other than their job description. To illustrate, let us look at the example of Honeywell, an automation company. Honeywell restricted the expert hiring last year because of high salary expectations with limited work function, and it started to use beginners for multiple tasks like office and field operations. In this way, Honeywell gained the respect of participations and started to do business in other fields as it saved money rather than spending it on experts.
Admittedly, some may argue that experts are more likely than the beginners to make significant contributions. This is true especially when it comes to critical decisions about the company, foundation etc. Additionally, experts tend to do fewer mistakes than the beginners as they are more experienced at their field. However, the above argument does not constitute a sufficient support to claim that experts are always the decision makers or they do not do terrible mistakes. Joseph Dylan, for instance, IT director of Isbank, launched a new function for Isbank’s mobile application last month, but there was a bug which showed foreign currencies two times lesser than they are. When the company noticed the error, it has already lost $1.5 million. Hence, it is not a valid claim that as expertise of people greater, more they contribute.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 254, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rmation, big data, machine learning etc. In contrast, most of the experts are spe...
^^
Line 3, column 591, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...quently, the firm increased its worth by billion in five years by using this meth...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in contrast, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2108.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 412.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11650485437 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90235092169 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594660194175 0.4932671777 121% => OK
syllable_count: 657.0 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.9819147798 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.380952381 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.619047619 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.04761904762 5.21951772744 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339942158145 0.243740707755 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0998336020529 0.0831039109588 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128954230977 0.0758088955206 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203603042276 0.150359130593 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0687146340812 0.0667264976115 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 100.480337079 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.