In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
No one can gainsay that contemporary societies have benefitted from innovation and new discoveries. Indisputably, some indivisuals are of the opinion that a novice or an amateur in any fields are more likely to contribute to new findings due to their ambitious mindsets and creative thinking. However, not everyone supports such idea. In some cases, seasoned and knowledgeable experts may be able to make a great break-thorough based on their rich experiences and expertise.
First and foremost, beginners can be important assets to new discovery and inventions. To be specific, they are generally assertive and adventurous, so they are prone to challenge the conventional idea and concept. For instance, they may throw a question on why they are supposed to take an A route, which is most commonly used and established way that everyone follows, and attempt to examine whether A way is the most effectual or not. This may lead to new discovery and innovation. Similary, they are also, as rule of thumbs, creative than the experienced. As everything is new to them, and they have to learn it, they are more open-minded and inclined to come up with original ideas or solutions to a problem. For instance, Steve Jobs is an iconic figure as an creative inventer, who always emphasized on creative thinkings, and he also made a great contribution to new ways using portable computers. Therefore, novice can take advantages on ambitious and creative mindsets to innovative development.
On the other hand, experts who engage in a field for a long term have certainly great ascendency to acheiving new discovery or development. First of all, they are more knowledgeable and sagacious than novice. They have accumulated a great deal of knowledge and expertise from many different areas, so that they are able to combine different concepts and to create better solutions. Secondly, they are also more catchy and sensitive to understand subtle meaning behind the complex phenomenon, based on their enriched experience. They are able to analyse convoluted aspects of a certain event, and understand how to solve or utilize the hiddent potential in the finding. In addition, experts have definitely spent more time and devotions to their works than the novice, and thus there are high potential to find ground-breaking discoveries. Thomas Edison once metioned that “ a genious consists of 1% of inspiration (creativity) and 99% of perspiration (experiences and knowledge). Therefore, experienced experts are able to create more creative and wiseful solution to various problmes than novice. As seen in these cases, experts can be more competent to interprete and analyze new findings and suggest efficient ways to make use of the discovery in a practical way than the beginners.
Based on above discussion, there is no denying the fact that the beginners can be creative and innovative to promote new findings. However, not always is it ture. There are certainly better opportunity that experts can contribute to new discoveries based on their opulent experience and knowledge base as well as their devotion and time consumed for the job. Therefore, we should appreciate experienced people for their contributions to new break-through and encourage young people to endeavor to be experts.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 289, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'an' or 'A' is left.
Suggestion: an; A
...estion on why they are supposed to take an A route, which is most commonly used and ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 763, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ance, Steve Jobs is an iconic figure as an creative inventer, who always emphasize...
^^
Line 5, column 277, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...at deal of knowledge and expertise from many different areas, so that they are able to combine...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1249, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a practical way" with adverb for "practical"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...cient ways to make use of the discovery in a practical way than the beginners. Based on above d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 145, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put after the verb 'is'.
Suggestion: is always
...e to promote new findings. However, not always is it ture. There are certainly better opp...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in addition, as well as, first of all, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 36.0 14.8657303371 242% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2764.0 2235.4752809 124% => OK
No of words: 526.0 442.535393258 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25475285171 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78901763229 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05171633256 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488593155894 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 902.7 704.065955056 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5802174768 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.56 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.04 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64 5.21951772744 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 10.2758426966 195% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104034267636 0.243740707755 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0310352604493 0.0831039109588 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0273718657376 0.0758088955206 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0661276433558 0.150359130593 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0194839503353 0.0667264976115 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 144.0 100.480337079 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.