In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
The above lines depicting that in any field of inquiry, the beginner or the novice is more likely to make important contributions than the expert is a very subjective topic to be discussed. Every department in any sector comprises both the rookies or the beginners and senior level people trying to work hard in order make some progress towards any inquiry that has been taking place lately. The beginner who is new to a particular firm tries to garner valuable suggestions from his senior and emulates his work ethic to flourish his fledling career at a business or a law firm. Let us consider an example of a law firm where the juniors who are freshly hired as associates are given a tonnes of work in the initial days to prove thier mettle to the managing partners at the firm.
The senior employee who is already having loads of experience in the field of law acts as an added advantage when any new client with a case appears to them for help. The most mundane form of cases given to the senior and his associate/junior are the 'Pro Bono' cases. These are such type of cases where the senior doesnt spend a lot of time on due diligence or investigation as he is already familiar with the inital stages and takes the inquiry to the next level at a faster pace. In such ways, the senior not only acts as a quicker medium between the clients and his firm with shrewd solutions but also makes some valuable billings and contributions towards the case given to him. Additionally he is the one who takes up the job of molding the newly hired associate or beginner under him. With that being said, the beginner or the associate is the one that always stays and works in close coordination with his senior likely with an aim to become his protege.
It is the beginner that does put in a lot of effort in the inquiry or the due diligence of a particular case. Since he is the one who is new to the corporate world, he plans his tasks meticulously in an orthodox manner thereby creating a larger effect on the case than his senior who sort of slacks off in such situations where prior inquiry is needed. Starting from the most basic to the difficult cases, the associate is the one who is supposed to lay an intial inquiry and file a subpoena for the court of a client hearing if necessary. He does all the work diligently almost similar to that of a federal prosecutor and is likely to receives accolades from the seniors at his firm for him excelling at work.
In conclusion, would a beginner make imporant contributions than the senior in a field of inquiry? Yes. As he is the one who knows the plaintiffs in person after building a strong rapport with them during the inquiry of a particular case and moreover strong decision making skills at the right moment allows him to make important contributions than some seniors at the firm.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 438, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'try'?
Suggestion: try
...eginner who is new to a particular firm tries to garner valuable suggestions from his...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 685, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a tonne' or simply 'tonnes'?
Suggestion: a tonne; tonnes
...e freshly hired as associates are given a tonnes of work in the initial days to prove th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 314, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...are such type of cases where the senior doesnt spend a lot of time on due diligence or...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 683, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Additionally,
...ibutions towards the case given to him. Additionally he is the one who takes up the job of m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 281, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a sort'.
Suggestion: who is a sort
...rger effect on the case than his senior who sort of slacks off in such situations where ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, in conclusion, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 12.4196629213 8% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2325.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 515.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5145631068 5.05705443957 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.763781212 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54081657985 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.456310679612 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 755.1 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 23.0359550562 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.8530561352 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.3125 118.986275619 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.1875 23.4991977007 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1875 5.21951772744 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198476767528 0.243740707755 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0842111239025 0.0831039109588 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129769880093 0.0758088955206 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143315208716 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0922377789095 0.0667264976115 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 48.8420337079 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.47 12.1639044944 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.8971910112 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.2143820225 132% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.